netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com
Cc: aduyck@mirantis.com, tom@herbertland.com,
	alexander.duyck@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:10:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160518.211043.773402183440053556.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463606878.2713.68.camel@intel.com>

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:27:58 -0700

> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 10:44 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> This patch series is meant to be applied after:
>> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6
>> tunneling
>> 
>> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 and
>> is
>> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based GRE
>> tunnels.
>> 
>> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the
>> Intel
>> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads.  I
>> have
>> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e
>> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is still
>> passing traffic at around the same rate.  I plan to do further testing
>> but
>> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be able
>> to
>> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware
>> offloads.
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Alexander Duyck (2):
>>       ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled
>> with FOU/GUE
>>       intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload
> 
> Dave, I have this series added to my queue.

Why would you if it depends upon Tom's series, as mentioned above, which
isn't even in my tree yet?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-18 17:44 [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] ip6_gre: Do not allow segmentation offloads GRE_CSUM is enabled with FOU/GUE Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 17:44 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] intel: Add support for IPv6 IP-in-IP offload Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 21:27 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-18 23:19   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-05-18 23:31     ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-19  4:10   ` David Miller [this message]
2016-05-24 17:14     ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-05-24 17:46       ` Alex Duyck
2016-05-20 23:26 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160518.211043.773402183440053556.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).