From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Xi Wang <xii@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] tuntap: correctly wake up process during uninit
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:51:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160519145115-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463636211-3573-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to check dev->reg_state against NETREG_REGISTERED after each
> time we are woke up. But after commit 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun:
> restructure tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup efficiency"), it uses
> skb_recv_datagram() which does not check dev->reg_state. This will
> result if we delete a tun/tap device after a process is blocked in the
> reading. The device will wait for the reference count which was held
> by that process for ever.
>
> Fixes this by using RCV_SHUTDOWN which will be checked during
> sk_recv_datagram() before trying to wake up the process during uninit.
>
> Fixes: 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better
> sleep/wakeup efficiency")
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Xi Wang <xii@google.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> - The patch is needed for -stable.
> - Changes from v1: remove unnecessary NETREG_REGISTERED check in tun_do_read()
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 425e983..e16487c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -580,11 +580,13 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
> BUG_ON(!tfile);
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown = RCV_SHUTDOWN;
> tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> --tun->numqueues;
> }
> list_for_each_entry(tfile, &tun->disabled, next) {
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown = RCV_SHUTDOWN;
> tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
> }
> @@ -641,6 +643,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file, bool skip_filte
> goto out;
> }
> tfile->queue_index = tun->numqueues;
> + tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown &= ~RCV_SHUTDOWN;
> rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
> rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
> tun->numqueues++;
> @@ -1491,9 +1494,6 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> if (!iov_iter_count(to))
> return 0;
>
> - if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
> - return -EIO;
> -
> /* Read frames from queue */
> skb = __skb_recv_datagram(tfile->socket.sk, noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0,
> &peeked, &off, &err);
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-19 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-19 5:36 [PATCH net V2] tuntap: correctly wake up process during uninit Jason Wang
2016-05-19 11:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-19 11:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-05-20 23:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160519145115-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xii@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).