From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:26:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20160520.192617.407123677086722342.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tom@herbertland.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com To: aduyck@mirantis.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:53371 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751215AbcETX0T (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 19:26:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160518173605.2608.42484.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexander Duyck Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 10:44:40 -0700 > This patch series is meant to be applied after: > [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 tunneling > > The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 and is > now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based GRE > tunnels. > > The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the Intel > NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads. I have > only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e > interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is still > passing traffic at around the same rate. I plan to do further testing but > with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be able to > test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware offloads. Series applied, thanks Alex.