From: Shuyu Wei <wsy2220@gmail.com>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
wxt@rock-chips.com, heiko@sntech.de,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
al.kochet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ethernet:arc: Fix racing of TX ring buffer
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 19:36:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160523113609.GA21019@debian-dorm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57419853.9050701@gmx.de>
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing. However that extra check for skb not being NULL should not be
> necessary if the code were correct. The changes I suggested were all about having
> skb and info consistent with txbd_curr.
> But I just realized that there is still a big flaw in the last changes. While
> tx() looks correct now (we first set up the descriptor and assign the skb and _then_
> advance txbd_curr) tx_clean still is not:
>
> We _first_ have to read tx_curr and _then_ read the corresponding descriptor and its skb.
> (The last patch implemented just the reverse - and thus wrong - order, first get skb and
> descriptor and then read tx_curr).
>
> So the patch below hopefully handles also tx_clean correctly. Could you please do once more a test
> with this one?
Hi Lino,
This patch worked after a whole night of stress testing.
> >
> > After further test, my patch to barrier timestamp() didn't work.
> > Just like the original code in the tree, the emac still got stuck under
> > high load, even if I changed the smp_wmb() to dma_wmb(). So the original
> > code do have race somewhere.
>
> So to make this clear: with the current code in net-next you still see a problem (lockup), right?
Yes, I mean the mainline kernel, which should be the same as net-next.
> > ... and why Francois' fix worked. Please be patient with me :-).
>
> So which fix(es) exactly work for you and solve your lockup issue?
I mean the patch below, starting this thread.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c
index a3a9392..df3dfef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c
@@ -153,9 +153,8 @@ static void arc_emac_tx_clean(struct net_device *ndev)
{
struct arc_emac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
- unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < TX_BD_NUM; i++) {
+ while (priv->txbd_dirty != priv->txbd_curr) {
unsigned int *txbd_dirty = &priv->txbd_dirty;
struct arc_emac_bd *txbd = &priv->txbd[*txbd_dirty];
struct buffer_state *tx_buff = &priv->tx_buff[*txbd_dirty];
@@ -685,13 +684,15 @@ static int arc_emac_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
wmb();
skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
+ priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr].skb = skb;
+
+ dma_wmb();
*info = cpu_to_le32(FOR_EMAC | FIRST_OR_LAST_MASK | len);
/* Make sure info word is set */
wmb();
- priv->tx_buff[*txbd_curr].skb = skb;
/* Increment index to point to the next BD */
*txbd_curr = (*txbd_curr + 1) % TX_BD_NUM;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-23 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 15:25 [PATCH v2] ethernet:arc: Fix racing of TX ring buffer Shuyu Wei
2016-05-17 16:36 ` Aw: " Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-17 18:24 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <20160517.142456.2247845107325931733.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 0:01 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160518000153.GA21757-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 20:29 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <573CD09D.1060307-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 22:55 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160518225529.GA18671-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-19 21:15 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <573E2D0C.604-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-20 0:31 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-21 16:09 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-21 19:47 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160521194733.GA30557-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-21 23:04 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <5740E98A.5050803-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-22 21:21 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-21 22:58 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-22 9:17 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-22 11:30 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <57419853.9050701-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-22 22:36 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] ` <20160522223659.GB5086-lmTtMILVy1jWQcoT9B9Ug5SCg42XY1Uw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-24 1:09 ` Lino Sanfilippo
[not found] ` <5743A9DD.8010202-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-24 19:02 ` Francois Romieu
2016-05-24 23:56 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-28 6:43 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-05-30 21:41 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-06-05 14:02 ` Shuyu Wei
2016-06-08 7:54 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-23 11:36 ` Shuyu Wei [this message]
2016-05-24 1:14 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-05-21 13:46 ` Shuyu Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160523113609.GA21019@debian-dorm \
--to=wsy2220@gmail.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=al.kochet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).