From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [RFC] NET: PHY: adds driver for Lantiq PHY11G Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:53:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20160523115316.GA17916@lunn.ch> References: <1463945631-29273-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <20160523024217.GB20405@lunn.ch> <9231D502B07C5E4A8B32D5115C9F19991E917475@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Hauke Mehrtens , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "john@phrozen.org" , "openwrt@kresin.me" To: "Mehrtens, Hauke" Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:47858 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751771AbcEWLxX (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2016 07:53:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9231D502B07C5E4A8B32D5115C9F19991E917475@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > I doubt the device tree maintainers will accept this. You don't normally put > > register values in device tree. > > Me too ;-) > > I will look into this: > http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2016/03/23/61 and also try to make > the device tree interface more generic. Please take more notice of my emails than what was submitted. > Should I first send a patch without the led configuration so this led stuff is a separate topic? Yes, you can do that. If you go the direction i suggests, that it a big piece of work, and does not need to hold up the rest of the driver. Andrew