* [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets
@ 2016-06-03 9:39 Ido Schimmel
2016-06-04 6:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-06-05 7:40 ` Ido Schimmel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2016-06-03 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stephen, davem
Cc: yotamg, netdev, bridge, Florian Westphal, Ido Schimmel, jiri,
nogahf, eladr, ogerlitz
Commit 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook
returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") fixed incorrect usage of NF_HOOK's
return value by consuming packets in okfn via br_pass_frame_up().
However, this function re-injects packets to the Rx path with skb->dev
set to the bridge device, which breaks kernel's STP, as all STP packets
appear to originate from the bridge device itself.
Instead, if okfn was called for a packet, make bridge's rx_handler
re-inject it to the Rx path by returning RX_HANDLER_PASS. This is
consistent with previous behavior.
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Fixes: 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
---
net/bridge/br_input.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index 1607977..c73ed44 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -223,9 +223,7 @@ static int br_handle_local_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
if (p->flags & BR_LEARNING && br_should_learn(p, skb, &vid))
br_fdb_update(p->br, p, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid, false);
- BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev = p->br->dev;
- br_pass_frame_up(skb);
- return 0;
+ return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
}
/*
@@ -238,6 +236,7 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
br_should_route_hook_t *rhook;
+ int err;
if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
@@ -287,8 +286,11 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
}
/* Deliver packet to local host only */
- NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
- NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL, br_handle_local_finish);
+ err = NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
+ NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
+ br_handle_local_finish);
+ if (err == RX_HANDLER_PASS)
+ return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
}
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets
2016-06-03 9:39 [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets Ido Schimmel
@ 2016-06-04 6:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-06-04 8:15 ` Ido Schimmel
2016-06-05 7:40 ` Ido Schimmel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shmulik Ladkani @ 2016-06-04 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ido Schimmel
Cc: stephen, davem, bridge, netdev, eladr, ogerlitz, jiri, yotamg,
nogahf, Florian Westphal
Hi,
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:39:45 +0300 Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index 1607977..c73ed44 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -223,9 +223,7 @@ static int br_handle_local_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
> if (p->flags & BR_LEARNING && br_should_learn(p, skb, &vid))
> br_fdb_update(p->br, p, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid, false);
>
> - BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev = p->br->dev;
> - br_pass_frame_up(skb);
> - return 0;
> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -238,6 +236,7 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
> const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
> br_should_route_hook_t *rhook;
> + int err;
>
> if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
> return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> @@ -287,8 +286,11 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> }
>
> /* Deliver packet to local host only */
> - NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
> - NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL, br_handle_local_finish);
> + err = NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
> + NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
> + br_handle_local_finish);
> + if (err == RX_HANDLER_PASS)
> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
Seems '*pskb = skb' is needed prior returning RX_HANDLER_PASS - there's
a 'skb = skb_share_check()' at beginning of br_handle_frame.
(The *pskb = skb was present prior 8626c56c8279, but gone since there
was no longer an RX_HANDLER_PASS return).
One nit to consider:
The fix relies on the fact that RX_HANDLER_PASS != 0 (otherwise we end up
not knowing whether skb was STOLEN or br_handle_local_finish has
executed, which was the original problem 8626c56c8279 tried to address).
No reason to use the RX_HANDLER_xxx enumeration space as the ret code
of an 'okfn' (br_handle_local_finish in this case).
Some positive value locally defined in br_input.c (and documented in
br_handle_local_finish) would do.
Regards,
Shmulik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets
2016-06-04 6:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani
@ 2016-06-04 8:15 ` Ido Schimmel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2016-06-04 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shmulik Ladkani
Cc: yotamg, netdev, bridge, Florian Westphal, jiri, nogahf, eladr,
ogerlitz, davem
Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:41:41AM IDT, shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:39:45 +0300 Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> index 1607977..c73ed44 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
>> @@ -223,9 +223,7 @@ static int br_handle_local_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
>> if (p->flags & BR_LEARNING && br_should_learn(p, skb, &vid))
>> br_fdb_update(p->br, p, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid, false);
>>
>> - BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->brdev = p->br->dev;
>> - br_pass_frame_up(skb);
>> - return 0;
>> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -238,6 +236,7 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>> struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
>> const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
>> br_should_route_hook_t *rhook;
>> + int err;
>>
>> if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
>> return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
>> @@ -287,8 +286,11 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>> }
>>
>> /* Deliver packet to local host only */
>> - NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
>> - NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL, br_handle_local_finish);
>> + err = NF_HOOK(NFPROTO_BRIDGE, NF_BR_LOCAL_IN, dev_net(skb->dev),
>> + NULL, skb, skb->dev, NULL,
>> + br_handle_local_finish);
>> + if (err == RX_HANDLER_PASS)
>> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
>> return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
>
>Seems '*pskb = skb' is needed prior returning RX_HANDLER_PASS - there's
>a 'skb = skb_share_check()' at beginning of br_handle_frame.
>
>(The *pskb = skb was present prior 8626c56c8279, but gone since there
>was no longer an RX_HANDLER_PASS return).
Right! Will fix that in v2.
>
>One nit to consider:
>
>The fix relies on the fact that RX_HANDLER_PASS != 0 (otherwise we end up
>not knowing whether skb was STOLEN or br_handle_local_finish has
>executed, which was the original problem 8626c56c8279 tried to address).
>
>No reason to use the RX_HANDLER_xxx enumeration space as the ret code
>of an 'okfn' (br_handle_local_finish in this case).
>Some positive value locally defined in br_input.c (and documented in
>br_handle_local_finish) would do.
Yes, I agree it would be clearer to state that explicitly. Will add that
in v2.
Thanks for reviewing!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets
2016-06-03 9:39 [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets Ido Schimmel
2016-06-04 6:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani
@ 2016-06-05 7:40 ` Ido Schimmel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ido Schimmel @ 2016-06-05 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stephen, davem, fw; +Cc: yotamg, netdev, bridge, jiri, nogahf, eladr, ogerlitz
Hi Florian,
Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:39:45PM IDT, idosch@mellanox.com wrote:
>Commit 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook
>returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict") fixed incorrect usage of NF_HOOK's
>return value by consuming packets in okfn via br_pass_frame_up().
>
>However, this function re-injects packets to the Rx path with skb->dev
>set to the bridge device, which breaks kernel's STP, as all STP packets
>appear to originate from the bridge device itself.
>
>Instead, if okfn was called for a packet, make bridge's rx_handler
>re-inject it to the Rx path by returning RX_HANDLER_PASS. This is
>consistent with previous behavior.
>
>Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
>Fixes: 8626c56c8279 ("bridge: fix potential use-after-free when hook returns QUEUE or STOLEN verdict")
>Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
I read your commit more closely and also looked at nf_reinject() and I'm
not sure how the fix should be carried out.
After packet is processed by okfn it should return to the Rx path -
by making bridge's rx_handler return RX_HANDLER_PASS - so that it
could be picked up by the packet handlers.
However, if verdict is NF_QUEUE and packet is later re-injected via
nf_reinject() then this can't happen, as rx_handler already returned
RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED for the packet.
So, my patch is wrong because it doesn't consume the packet in okfn, but
yours consumes it in a way which breaks current packet handlers.
Any suggestions regarding a fix? I have a feeling I'm missing something
obvious.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-05 7:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-03 9:39 [PATCH net] bridge: Fix incorrect re-injection of STP packets Ido Schimmel
2016-06-04 6:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-06-04 8:15 ` Ido Schimmel
2016-06-05 7:40 ` Ido Schimmel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).