From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: wireless: marvell: libertas: Remove create_workqueue
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 19:29:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160604135901.GA29897@Karyakshetra> (raw)
alloc_workqueue replaces deprecated create_workqueue().
In if_sdio.c, the workqueue card->workqueue has workitem
&card->packet_worker, which is mapped to if_sdio_host_to_card_worker.
The workitem is involved in sending packets to firmware.
Forward progress under memory pressure is a requirement here.
In if_spi.c, the workqueue card->workqueue has workitem
&card->packet_worker, which is mapped to if_spi_host_to_card_worker.
The workitem is involved in sending command packets from the host.
Forward progress under memory pressure is a requirement here.
Dedicated workqueues have been used in both cases since the workitems
on the workqueues are involved in normal device operation with
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set to gurantee forward progress under memory pressure.
Since there are only a fixed number of work items, explicit concurrency
limit is unnecessary.
flush_workqueue is unnecessary since destroy_workqueue() itself calls
drain_workqueue() which flushes repeatedly till the workqueue
becomes empty. Hence the calls to flush_workqueue() before
destroy_workqueue() have been dropped.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_sdio.c | 3 +--
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_sdio.c
index 13eae9f..47f4a14 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_sdio.c
@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ static int if_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
}
spin_lock_init(&card->lock);
- card->workqueue = create_workqueue("libertas_sdio");
+ card->workqueue = alloc_workqueue("libertas_sdio", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
INIT_WORK(&card->packet_worker, if_sdio_host_to_card_worker);
init_waitqueue_head(&card->pwron_waitq);
@@ -1326,7 +1326,6 @@ static void if_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
lbs_stop_card(card->priv);
lbs_remove_card(card->priv);
- flush_workqueue(card->workqueue);
destroy_workqueue(card->workqueue);
while (card->packets) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
index 82c0796..c3a53cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/libertas/if_spi.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static int if_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
priv->fw_ready = 1;
/* Initialize interrupt handling stuff. */
- card->workqueue = create_workqueue("libertas_spi");
+ card->workqueue = alloc_workqueue("libertas_spi", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
INIT_WORK(&card->packet_work, if_spi_host_to_card_worker);
INIT_WORK(&card->resume_work, if_spi_resume_worker);
@@ -1208,7 +1208,6 @@ static int if_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
release_irq:
free_irq(spi->irq, card);
terminate_workqueue:
- flush_workqueue(card->workqueue);
destroy_workqueue(card->workqueue);
lbs_remove_card(priv); /* will call free_netdev */
free_card:
@@ -1235,7 +1234,6 @@ static int libertas_spi_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
lbs_remove_card(priv); /* will call free_netdev */
free_irq(spi->irq, card);
- flush_workqueue(card->workqueue);
destroy_workqueue(card->workqueue);
if (card->pdata->teardown)
card->pdata->teardown(spi);
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-04 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-04 13:59 Bhaktipriya Shridhar [this message]
2016-06-04 14:29 ` [PATCH] net: wireless: marvell: libertas: Remove create_workqueue Kalle Valo
2016-06-04 14:32 ` Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-05 10:22 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-16 15:22 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160604135901.GA29897@Karyakshetra \
--to=bhaktipriya96@gmail.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).