From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jkbs@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jtluka@redhat.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: Skip XFRM lookup if dst_entry in socket cache is valid
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608.111651.567746976064784585.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465391614-8961-1-git-send-email-jkbs@redhat.com>
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:13:34 +0200
> At present we perform an xfrm_lookup() for each UDPv6 message we
> send. The lookup involves querying the flow cache (flow_cache_lookup)
> and, in case of a cache miss, creating an XFRM bundle.
>
> If we miss the flow cache, we can end up creating a new bundle and
> deriving the path MTU (xfrm_init_pmtu) from on an already transformed
> dst_entry, which we pass from the socket cache (sk->sk_dst_cache) down
> to xfrm_lookup(). This can happen only if we're caching the dst_entry
> in the socket, that is when we're using a connected UDP socket.
>
> To put it another way, the path MTU shrinks each time we miss the flow
> cache, which later on leads to incorrectly fragmented payload. It can
> be observed with ESPv6 in transport mode:
...
> To prevent the recreation of an XFRM bundle, avoid an XFRM lookup
> altogether whenever we already have a destination entry cached in the
> socket. This prevents the path MTU shrinkage and brings us on par with
> UDPv4.
>
> The fix also benefits connected PINGv6 sockets, another user of
> ip6_sk_dst_lookup_flow(), who also suffer messages being transformed
> twice.
>
> Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Tluka <jtluka@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 13:13 [PATCH net] ipv6: Skip XFRM lookup if dst_entry in socket cache is valid Jakub Sitnicki
2016-06-08 18:16 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608.111651.567746976064784585.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jkbs@redhat.com \
--cc=jtluka@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).