From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Bert Kenward <bkenward@solarflare.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] sfc: report supported link speeds on SFP connections
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:41:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608134114.GJ56933@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607212016.GH56933@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:20:16PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:55:29PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Bert Kenward wrote:
> > > 7000-series SFC NICs connected with an SFP+ module currently fail to
> > > report any supported link speeds.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@solarflare.com>
> >
> > Had a feeling my cut might not have been quite right. Looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
>
> ...however, upon testing, there's a gotcha. This results in my 10Gbps sfc
> nic reporting that it supports 40Gbps:
>
> $ ethtool ens4f0
> Settings for ens4f0:
> Supported ports: [ FIBRE ]
> Supported link modes: 1000baseT/Full
> 10000baseT/Full
> 40000baseKR4/Full
This turned out to be a flub on my part. My local tree wasn't clean, had
some lingering test/debug crap in it that I thought I'd removed, but
clearly, hadn't. With that removed, we're all good here.
Tested-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 1:33 [PATCH net] ethernet/sfc: report supported link speeds on SFP connections Jarod Wilson
2016-06-03 23:50 ` David Miller
2016-06-06 15:07 ` Bert Kenward
2016-06-06 16:29 ` [PATCH net v2] sfc: " Bert Kenward
2016-06-06 18:55 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-06-07 21:20 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-06-08 13:41 ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2016-06-08 18:19 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608134114.GJ56933@redhat.com \
--to=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=bkenward@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).