From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: pull-request: mac80211-next 2016-06-09 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160610.231604.604019579709781335.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1465477466-23756-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org To: johannes@sipsolutions.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35163 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041AbcFKGQG (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 02:16:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1465477466-23756-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Johannes Berg Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:04:25 +0200 > Here's my first set of changes for -next. The only exciting part are = the > changes from Micha=A9=A9 to integrate FQ/codel into mac80211's softwa= re queues > to improve cross-station latency and finally solve much of the latenc= y > issues so many people have spent so much time talking about, but neve= r > actually working on fixing until he did :) >=20 > Can I ask you to pull net into net-next, preferably before merging th= is? > I have a patch that is unsafe without a fix that I submitted through > mac80211 previously (last time, not the pull request a few minutes ag= o), > and I'd prefer not to have that in our -next trees without the fix. I= f > you merge net into net-next before this pull request I can fast-forwa= rd > mac80211-next to this merge later. >=20 > Let me know if there's any problem. Looks good, pulled, thanks!