From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [very-RFC 0/8] TSN driver for the kernel Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:37:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20160613193743.GB2441@netboy> References: <1465686096-22156-1-git-send-email-henrik@austad.us> <20160613114713.GA9544@localhost.localdomain> <20160613130059.GA20320@sisyphus.home.austad.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann To: Henrik Austad Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:36796 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161119AbcFMThs (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:37:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160613130059.GA20320@sisyphus.home.austad.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:47:13PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > People have been asking me about TSN and Linux, and we've made some > > thoughts about it. The interest is there, and so I am glad to see > > discussion on this topic. > > I'm not aware of any such discussions, could you point me to where TSN has > been discussed, it would be nice to see other peoples thought on the matter > (which was one of the ideas behind this series in the first place) To my knowledge, there hasn't been any previous TSN talk on lkml. (You have just now started the discussion ;) Sorry for not being clear. Richard