From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>
Cc: "open list:TI NETCP ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
john.r.fastabend@intel.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Avoiding bridge flood of multicast when L2 switch is used
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:26:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614202626.GD8518@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57606530.6030208@ti.com>
> netdev experts,
>
> When there is a L2 switch underneath the network interface a flooding of
> multicast at the bridge interface results in one copy of this going through each
> of the slave resulting in multiple multicast packets reaching the underlying switch.
Yes, this is something Florian, Vivien and i have discussed. We don't
yet see a way around it. Neither the Marvell or Broadcast switches
have a mechanism to say: Send this frame out of this list of
interfaces. All we can do is send it out a single interface. Even if
we could direct a single frame out multiple interfaces, we still have
the problem of how to teach the bridge about this, in a clean and
elegant fashion.
Overall, this seems like a hard problem. Since it is a hard problem,
implementing IGMP snooping first would make sense. Don't forward the
packet out a port unless you know there is somebody interested in it.
The swichdev parts of IGMP snooping are in place, we just need to
continue them down into DSA.
> L2 switch also duplicates the multicast packet on each egress port as done
> in software bridge. This is undesirable as it reduces the available bandwidth to
> half when multicast packets are involved.
Once you have a DSA driver, the switch will not do this replication.
So you will gain something there.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 20:12 Avoiding bridge flood of multicast when L2 switch is used Murali Karicheri
2016-06-14 20:26 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614202626.GD8518@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).