netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: split classification and enqueue
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:23:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622172344.GG10213@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpXGX=jPO7q=W32o3X2_4ce5PbY2PuTMhkmhtGP6PXuH4Q@mail.gmail.com>

Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> >
> > This (unfinished!) hack splits classification and enqueue into
> > two steps.
> >
> > Before enqueueing the packet and *before* acquiring the root qdisc lock,
> > the new qdisc ->classify() function is invoked.
> >
> > This function -- much like enqueue in the current scheme -- looks up
> > a child class and/or determines the next qdisc where the packet needs
> > to be handled via the classifier action subsystem.
> > Then it invokes the new ->classify() hook of the child, which can repeat
> > until the leaf qdisc is reached.
> 
> Then how is the atomicity guaranteed? One of the important
> purposes of the qdisc lock is to guarantee the atomicity of any
> change of in the whole hierarchy, i.e., qdisc/class/filter/action.

Not in this PoC, but I think that this could be solved e.g. by adding a
sequence counter that gets sampled pre-classify, we'd then only have to
check post-aquiring the root lock if its unchanged.  If not, some
class/filter, etc changed and we can just drop skb (or re-do the
classification, but I dislike such loops).

Only config changes would increment the counter, so it should not be
a lot of overhead.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22 10:03 [PATCH RFC] sched: split classification and enqueue Florian Westphal
2016-06-22 17:05 ` Cong Wang
2016-06-22 17:23   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-06-22 17:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-06-22 17:41   ` Florian Westphal
2016-06-22 18:15 ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160622172344.GG10213@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).