From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade.com>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Julien Floret <julien.floret@6wind.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH v3 0/6] Big C99 style initializer rework
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:10:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160627141049.356c1eff@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160627182302.GB13664@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:23:02 +0200
Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:59:12AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:34:08 +0000
> > Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> >
> > > This is v3 of my C99-style initializer related patch series. The changes
> > > since v2 are:
> [...]
> >
> > I like the idea and it makes code cleaner. But doing this introduces lots of warnings
> > and that is not acceptable.
> > ip
> > CC ip.o
> > CC ipaddress.o
> > ipaddress.c: In function ‘print_queuelen’:
> > ipaddress.c:175:10: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
> > struct ifreq ifr = { 0 };
> > ^
>
> I saw these too with gcc-3.4.6 but not with 5.3.0. It appears to be a
> gcc bug[1]. One possible workaround is to match the brace level of the
> first field, but it's quite ugly: [2]. Another way might be to
> initialize one of the fields to zero, like so:
>
> | struct ifreq ifr = { .ifr_qlen = 0 };
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks, Phil
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
> [2] http://nwl.cc/cgi-bin/git/gitweb.cgi?p=iproute2.git;a=commitdiff;h=a1cbf2b63c995b2f633c5b4699248ab308b201d2;hp=3809cfec65b03716d1d0360338126df4b4f3fbf6
I am using gcc on Debian stable which is 5.3.1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-27 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <d6784d8bb2d84ceab6c1719e32e8fa8e@HQ1WP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com>
2016-06-27 17:59 ` [iproute PATCH v3 0/6] Big C99 style initializer rework Stephen Hemminger
2016-06-27 18:23 ` Phil Sutter
2016-06-27 21:10 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2016-06-28 17:37 ` Phil Sutter
2016-06-28 17:37 ` David Ahern
2016-06-28 17:58 ` Phil Sutter
2016-06-28 17:59 ` David Ahern
2016-06-28 18:07 ` Phil Sutter
2016-06-23 17:34 Phil Sutter
2016-06-24 9:17 ` David Laight
2016-06-24 11:47 ` Phil Sutter
2016-06-24 13:12 ` Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160627141049.356c1eff@xeon-e3 \
--to=shemming@brocade.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=julien.floret@6wind.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).