From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:45:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160630184242-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467269136-8082-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:45:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to
> eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The
> conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use
> it instead of sk_receive_queue.
>
> A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to
> use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through:
>
> - add the ability to resize multiple rings at once to avoid handling
> partial resize failure for mutiple rings.
> - add the support for zero length ring.
> - introduce a notifier which was triggered when tx_queue_len was
> changed for a netdev.
> - resize all queues during the tx_queue_len changing.
>
> Tests shows about 15% improvement on guest rx pps:
>
> Before: ~1300000pps
> After : ~1500000pps
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-from-altitude: 34697 feet.
> Changes from V3:
> - fix kbuild warnings
> - call NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN on IFLA_TXQLEN
>
> Changes from V2:
> - add multiple rings resizing support for ptr_ring/skb_array
> - add zero length ring support
> - introdce a NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
> - drop new flags
>
> Changes from V1:
> - switch to use skb array instead of a customized circular buffer
> - add non-blocking support
> - rename .peek to .peek_len
> - drop lockless peeking since test show very minor improvement
>
> Jason Wang (5):
> ptr_ring: support zero length ring
> skb_array: minor tweak
> skb_array: add wrappers for resizing
> net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN
> tun: switch to use skb array for tx
>
> Michael S. Tsirkin (1):
> ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues
>
> drivers/net/tun.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 16 ++++-
> include/linux/net.h | 1 +
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
> include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/skb_array.h | 13 +++-
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 15 ++++-
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 16 +++--
> tools/virtio/ringtest/ptr_ring.c | 5 ++
> 9 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 6:45 [PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun Jason Wang
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 1/6] ptr_ring: support zero length ring Jason Wang
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 2/6] skb_array: minor tweak Jason Wang
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 3/6] ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues Jason Wang
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 4/6] skb_array: add wrappers for resizing Jason Wang
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 5/6] net: introduce NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN Jason Wang
2016-06-30 16:33 ` John Fastabend
2016-06-30 6:45 ` [PATCH net-next V4 6/6] tun: switch to use skb array for tx Jason Wang
2016-06-30 15:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-07-01 6:04 ` [PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun Jason Wang
2016-07-01 9:40 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-06 17:45 Craig Gallek
2016-07-08 6:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-07-08 9:14 ` Jason Wang
2016-07-08 6:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160630184242-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).