From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: tracepoint napi:napi_poll add work and budget Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:19:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20160706091912.2e9cc431@redhat.com> References: <20160705173444.3113.23769.stgit@firesoul> <20160705.115544.1669783693320652521.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, brouer@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53806 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752525AbcGFHTQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:19:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160705.115544.1669783693320652521.davem@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:55:44 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer > Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 19:35:27 +0200 > > > Can this patch go thought the net-next tree? > > Sure... when it actually compiles. > > If you're changing a fundamental signature like this, it is in your > best interest to do an allmodconfig build... before I do. Ups! sorry about that! I'll fix it up and resubmit. -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer