From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
To: Yaniv Machani <yanivma@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maital Hahn <maitalm@ti.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mac80211: mesh: improve path resolving time
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:36:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160719123648.GC11996@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160713114528.24835-1-yanivma@ti.com>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 02:45:25PM +0300, Yaniv Machani wrote:
> When a packet is received for transmission,
> a PREQ frame is sent to resolve the appropriate path to the desired destination.
> After path was established, any sequential PREQ will be sent only after
> dot11MeshHWMPpreqMinInterval, which usually set to few seconds.
>
> This implementation has an impact in cases where we would like to
> resolve the path quickly.
> A clear example is when a peer was disconnected from us,
> while he acted as a hop to our destination.
> Although the path table will be cleared, the next PREQ frame will be sent only after reaching the MinInterval.
> This will cause unwanted delay, possibly of few seconds until the traffic will resume.
>
> if (!(mpath->flags & MESH_PATH_RESOLVING))
> - mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START);
> + mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START, true);
What about something like this here instead:
if (!(mpath->flags & MESH_PATH_RESOLVING)) {
/* force next preq to be sent without delay */
ifmsh->last_preq = jiffies - min_preq_int_jiff(sdata) - 1;
mesh_queue_preq(mpath, PREQ_Q_F_START);
}
Maybe a little more magic, but it has a comment explaining it and doesn't
add a bool parameter everywhere. Or, maybe even just do it inside
mesh_queue_preq() based on having PREQ_Q_F_START && !PREQ_Q_F_REFRESH (if
those are the only cases where "true" is passed).
Generally I try to avoid bool parameters where possible because when you
look at a callsite, you don't know immediately what "true" and "false"
mean, and also each one you add doubles the code paths through a given
function.
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-13 11:45 [PATCH v2 2/3] mac80211: mesh: improve path resolving time Yaniv Machani
2016-07-19 12:36 ` Bob Copeland [this message]
2016-08-11 13:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160719123648.GC11996@localhost \
--to=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maitalm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yanivma@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).