From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1115/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160802.105901.1278960621806579606.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160802121749.24461-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> <8737mns0qg.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20160802174733.GB4628@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, pablo@netfilter.org, kaber@trash.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johunt@akamai.com, vpai@akamai.com, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com To: pavel@ucw.cz Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160802174733.GB4628@amd> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Pavel Machek Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:47:33 +0200 > But that does not make me like the series. And yes, hiding backdoor > in one of those would be way too easy... This is one of the worst patch series submissions in history. At vger.kernel.org postmaster I just spent 45 minutes dealing with the fallout. 1200+ patches all at once, unacceptable. Every patch having the same Subject line text, unacceptable. Triggering rate limiting bounces on %50+ of all lkml recipients, unacceptable. This is why you don't spam lists with a thousand patches. If this is going to be properly submitted, it must be done in reasonable, bite size, pieces of 10 to 15 patches at a time.