From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] liquidio support for new device cn23xx Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160803.150504.2220219685584839824.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1470250549-10993-1-git-send-email-rvatsavayi@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rvatsavayi@caviumnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:50160 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758358AbcHCWFI (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:05:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1470250549-10993-1-git-send-email-rvatsavayi@caviumnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Raghu Vatsavayi Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:55:31 -0700 > Please consider following patches for support of new device > CN23XX in liquidio family of adapters. Patches may have to > be applied in following order as some of the patches depend > on earlier patches. You can't have the same Subject line text for every patch in the series. It is required that you use unique subject lines so that someone scanning the shortlog can see what is unique in each of these patches. And don't try to thward this by saying something like: liquidio support for new device cn23xx part 1 Really describe in words what each change is uniquely doing.