From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: wenxu@ucloud.cn, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
kaber@trash.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
wenx05124561@163.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ip_finish_output_gso: If skb_gso_network_seglen exceeds MTU, allow segmentation for gre tunneled skbs
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 22:41:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160811224132.7a17f0c3@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160810.173511.968926810628735179.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:35:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > commit b8247f095edd ("net: ip_finish_output_gso: If skb_gso_network_seglen
> > exceeds MTU, allow segmentation for local udp tunneled skbs")
> >
> > Given:
> > - tap0 and ovs-gre
> > - ovs-gre stacked on eth0, eth0 having the small mtu
> >
> > After encapsulation these skbs have skb_gso_network_seglen that exceed
> > eth0's ip_skb_dst_mtu. So the finnal each segment would be larger than
> > eth0 mtu. These packets maybe dropped.
> >
> > It has the same problem if tap0 bridge with ipgre or gretap device. So
> > the IPSKB_FRAG_SEGS flags should also be set in gre tunneled skbs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>
> I am rather certain that this test is intentionally restricted to
> UDP tunnel endpoints, because GRE and other tunnel types are PMTU safe.
>
> Hannes and Shmulik?
It was restricted to UDP tun encaps per Hannes' suggestion, in order to
scope the change, as Hannes hinted gre and ipip are pmtu-safe, see [1].
Glancing at ip_tunnel_xmit() --> tnl_update_pmtu(), they do seem to
handle PMTU, but - if I understand correctly - only in the !skb_is_gso
case.
(since 68c3316311 "v4 GRE: Add TCP segmentation offload for GRE")
This is probably due the same hidden assumption that 'gso_size' will be
suitable for the egress mtu even after encapsulation, which does not
hold true in some usecases as described in [2].
Therefore it might be that b8247f095edd needs to be augmented for
non-udp tunnels as well.
Hannes?
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg386447.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg385776.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-09 7:04 [PATCH] net: ip_finish_output_gso: If skb_gso_network_seglen exceeds MTU, allow segmentation for gre tunneled skbs wenxu
2016-08-11 0:35 ` David Miller
2016-08-11 19:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-08-12 4:29 ` wenxu
[not found] ` <80d116d7-e61c-1bbd-64bf-e3b1f809419b@ucloud.cn>
2016-08-12 5:18 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-12 11:11 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-08-15 11:16 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-16 7:12 ` wenxu
2016-08-19 7:26 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-19 9:20 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-08-19 13:40 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160811224132.7a17f0c3@halley \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenx05124561@163.com \
--cc=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).