From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Amir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net/sched: cls_flower, act_mirred: VXLAN
 redirect using TC
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:59:06 +0300
Message-ID: <20160815125906.GA30031@office.localdomain>
References: <20160814140652.15985-1-amir@vadai.me>
 <CAM_iQpXetPgj_nCdYL73r_2hDRmnCpa0-WrxN-UbwBsdFgouiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160815071121.GA2024@nanopsycho>
 <20160815081740.GA19058@office.localdomain>
 <20160815090804.GB19058@office.localdomain>
 <faa0a9ab-fc02-543e-c60a-0d22b253a830@mojatatu.com>
 <20160815123400.GH2024@nanopsycho>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
	Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com>,
	Oded Shanoon <odeds@mellanox.com>,
	Amir Vadai <amirva@mellanox.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35263 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752785AbcHOM7L (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:59:11 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id i5so11003425wmg.2
        for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 05:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160815123400.GH2024@nanopsycho>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:34:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:08:10PM CEST, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
> >On 16-08-15 05:08 AM, Amir Vadai wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:17:40AM +0300, Amir Vadai wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 09:11:22AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> > > Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:53:30PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Amir
> >> 
> >> Any objection to the following?
> >> 
> >> # ENCAP rule
> >> tc filter add dev $ETH protocol ip parent ffff: prio 10 \
> >> 		flower ip_proto 1 \
> >> 		action set_tunnel_key src_ip 11.11.0.1 dst_ip 11.11.0.2 key_id 11 dst_port 4789 \
> >> 		action mirred egress redirect dev $VXLAN
> >
> >Assuming $VXLAN is actually not a linux netdev of type vxlan?
> >then the action does vxlan encap redirect sends it to the $VXLAN
> >dev with encapsulation in place.
> >Sounds to me like a name like "vxlan" would be more usable. Example:
> 
> I believe those are generic tunelling data
> 
> 
> >
> >tc filter add dev $ETH protocol ip parent ffff: prio 10 ..
> >action vxlan encap src_ip 11.11.0.1 dst_ip 11.11.0.2 key_id 11 ....
> >action mirred egress redirect dev eth0
> >
> >> 
> >> # DECAP rule
> >> tc filter add dev $VXLAN protocol ip parent ffff: prio 10 \
> >> 		flower \
> >> 			enc_src_ip 11.11.0.2 enc_dst_ip 11.11.0.1 enc_key_id 11 \
> >> 			ip_proto 1 \
> >> 		action mirred egress redirect dev $ETH
> >> 
> >
> >And a decap would be of the form:
> >tc filter add dev $ETH protocol ip parent ffff: prio 10 ..
> >action vxlan decap
> 
> That's right. Amir, don't you need decap here to drop the tunnel
> metadata?
Right. will add a decap that will release it.

> 
> 
> >
> >i.e there is no redirect needed here, no?
> >
> >cheers,
> >jamal