From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] tcp: randomize tcp timestamp offsets for each connection
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:32:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160818223219.GB3789@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471537092.29842.62.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:48 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > commit ceaa1fef65a7c2e ("tcp: adding a per-socket timestamp offset")
> > added the main infrastructure that is needed for per-connection
> > randomization, in particular writing/reading the on-wire tcp header
> > format takes the offset into account so rest of stack can use normal
> > tcp_time_stamp (jiffies).
> >
> > So only two items are left:
> > - add a tsoffset for request sockets
> > - extend the tcp isn generator to also return another 32bit number
> > in addition to the ISN.
> >
> > Re-use of ISN generator also means timestamps are still monotonically
> > increasing for same connection quadruple.
>
> I like the idea, but the implementation looks a bit complex.
>
> Instead of initializing tsoffset to 0, we could simply use
>
> jhash(src_addr, dst_addr, boot_time_rnd)
>
> This way, even syncookies would be handled, and we do not need to
> increase tcp_request_sock size.
True, however I think it would be fairly easy to discover
boot_time_rnd given a few outputs, as jhash is not cryptograhic hash, no?
If thats not a concern I can just use jhash (not taking ports
into account doesn't seem to be a problem).
Alternatively (if tcp_request_sock increase/complexity is a problem)
I could either call the isn generator again, or add an extra function
for it (again using md5), I did not do this because I was afraid
it would be too expensive to do two md5 calculations.
Thanks for reviewing!
For cookies I had planned to just extend the cookie sha1 similar
to isn generator here, alternatives welcome.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-19 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-18 12:48 [RFC 0/3] tcp: increase resilence vs. blind data injection Florian Westphal
2016-08-18 12:48 ` [RFC 1/3] tcp: randomize tcp timestamp offsets for each connection Florian Westphal
2016-08-18 16:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-18 22:32 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-08-25 9:06 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-25 14:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-25 14:49 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-25 16:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-25 19:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-25 20:31 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-25 21:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-25 22:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-25 23:46 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-26 2:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-18 12:48 ` [RFC 2/3] tcp: add tcp_timestamps=2 mode to force tsecr validation on ofo segments Florian Westphal
2016-08-18 12:48 ` [RFC 3/3] tcp: add mib counter to track ts tsecr validation failures Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160818223219.GB3789@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).