From: Amir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/ip_tunnels: Introduce tunnel_id_to_key32() and key32_to_tunnel_id()
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:39:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160823063949.GA9128@office.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160822190027.6b4e6028@griffin>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 07:00:27PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> While cleaning this up, you may as well take the best of both
> implementations.
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:38:32 +0300, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > +static inline __be64 key32_to_tunnel_id(__be32 key)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > + return (__force __be64)((__force u32)key);
>
> The inner cast seems to be superfluous?
seems so. will check.
>
> > +#else
> > + return (__force __be64)((__force u64)key << 32);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Returns the least-significant 32 bits of a __be64. */
> > +static inline __be32 tunnel_id_to_key32(__be64 x)
>
> Please use a more descriptive name than "x". "tunnel_id" or "tun_id"
> seems to be more appropriate.
ack
>
> > +{
> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > + return (__force __be32)x;
> > +#else
> > + return (__force __be32)((__force u64)x >> 32);
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
> Looks good otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-23 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-22 14:38 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/sched: iptunnel encap/decap/classify using TC Amir Vadai
2016-08-22 14:38 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/ip_tunnels: Introduce tunnel_id_to_key32() and key32_to_tunnel_id() Amir Vadai
2016-08-22 17:00 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-23 6:39 ` Amir Vadai [this message]
2016-08-22 14:38 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/sched: cls_flower: Classify packet in ip tunnels Amir Vadai
2016-08-22 17:05 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-22 17:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-08-22 14:38 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/sched: Introduce act_iptunnel Amir Vadai
2016-08-22 17:07 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-22 17:57 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-23 8:42 ` Amir Vadai
2016-08-22 18:15 ` Or Gerlitz
2016-08-22 18:51 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-23 15:28 ` Amir Vadai
2016-08-23 15:33 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-23 16:05 ` Amir Vadai
2016-08-23 16:15 ` Jiri Benc
2016-08-23 12:37 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-08-23 16:21 ` Amir Vadai
2016-08-23 18:59 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-22 22:23 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/sched: iptunnel encap/decap/classify using TC Tom Herbert
2016-08-23 9:05 ` Amir Vadai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160823063949.GA9128@office.localdomain \
--to=amir@vadai.me \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadarh@mellanox.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).