netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: ip_finish_output_gso: Attempt gso_size clamping if segments exceed mtu
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:59:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824145942.GB7905@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160824175350.34df9f3b@pixies>

Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Normal ipv4 routing via vm1, no iptables etc. present, so
> > 
> > we have  hypervisor 1500 -> 1500 VM1 1280 -> 1280 VM2
> > 
> > Turning off gro avoids this problem.
> 
> I hit the BUG only when VM2's mtu is not set to 1280 (kept to the 1500
> default).

Right, 

> Otherwise, Hypervisor's TCP stack (sender) uses TCP MSS advertised by
> VM2 (which is 1240 if VM2 mtu properly configured), thus GRO taking
> place in VM1's eth0 is based on arriving segments (sized 1240).

True.

> Only if VM2 has mtu of 1500, the MSS seen by Hypervisor during handshake
> is 1460, thus GRO acting on VM1's eth0 is based on 1460 byte segments.
> This leads to "gso clamping" taking place, with the BUG in skb_segment
> (which btw, seems sensitive to change in gso_size only if GRO was
> merging into frag_list).
> 
> Can you please acknowledge our setup and reproduction are aligned?

Yes, seems setups are identical.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-24 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22 12:06 [RFC PATCH] net: ip_finish_output_gso: Attempt gso_size clamping if segments exceed mtu Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-22 12:58 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-22 13:05   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-24 14:53   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-24 14:59     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-08-25  9:05   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-08-26 11:19     ` Herbert Xu
2016-09-09  5:48     ` Shmulik Ladkani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160824145942.GB7905@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).