From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Anoop Naravaram <anaravaram@google.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, maheshb@google.com,
weiwan@google.com, tom@herbertland.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Networking cgroup controller
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:03:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824210357.GU8185@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470876798-4024-1-git-send-email-anaravaram@google.com>
Hello, Anoop.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 05:53:13PM -0700, Anoop Naravaram wrote:
> This patchset introduces a cgroup controller for the networking subsystem as a
> whole. As of now, this controller will be used for:
>
> * Limiting the specific ports that a process in a cgroup is allowed to bind
> to or listen on. For example, you can say that all the processes in a
> cgroup can only bind to ports 1000-2000, and listen on ports 1000-1100, which
> guarantees that the remaining ports will be available for other processes.
>
> * Restricting which DSCP values processes can use with their sockets. For
> example, you can say that all the processes in a cgroup can only send
> packets with a DSCP tag between 48 and 63 (corresponding to TOS values of
> 192 to 255).
>
> * Limiting the total number of udp ports that can be used by a process in a
> cgroup. For example, you can say that all the processes in one cgroup are
> allowed to use a total of up to 100 udp ports. Since the total number of udp
> ports that can be used by all processes is limited, this is useful for
> rationing out the ports to different process groups.
>
> In the future, more networking-related properties may be added to this
> controller.
Thanks for working on this; however, I share the sentiment expressed
by others that this looks like too piecemeal an approach. If there
are no alternatives, we surely should consider this but it at least
*looks* like bpf should be able to cover the same functionalities
without having to revise and extend in-kernel capabilities constantly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-24 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 0:53 [PATCH 0/5] Networking cgroup controller Anoop Naravaram
2016-08-11 0:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: create the networking " Anoop Naravaram
2016-08-11 0:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: add bind/listen ranges to net cgroup Anoop Naravaram
2016-08-13 4:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-08-15 19:05 ` Mahesh Bandewar
2016-08-17 3:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
[not found] ` <1470876798-4024-1-git-send-email-anaravaram-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 0:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: add udp limit " Anoop Naravaram
[not found] ` <1470876798-4024-4-git-send-email-anaravaram-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-13 4:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-08-15 19:16 ` Mahesh Bandewar
2016-08-23 7:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] Networking cgroup controller Parav Pandit
2016-08-11 0:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] net: add dscp ranges to net cgroup Anoop Naravaram
2016-08-11 0:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: add test for " Anoop Naravaram
2016-08-13 4:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-08-23 8:49 ` [PATCH 0/5] Networking cgroup controller Parav Pandit
2016-08-25 0:28 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2016-08-24 21:03 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-08-25 15:54 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
[not found] ` <CAF2d9jjXxjgJU1VWDERKkv4LRvmhpjpyx7Dx76egQx43aaXtmQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-25 16:09 ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-25 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2016-08-25 18:53 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2016-08-25 18:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-08-25 18:56 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2016-08-25 21:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160824210357.GU8185@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=anaravaram@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=maheshb@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).