From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: dsa: add MDB support Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:33:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20160831143315.GD15078@lunn.ch> References: <20160829203246.18811-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20160829203246.18811-2-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20160831132534.GA15078@lunn.ch> <87vayhvx0m.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli To: Vivien Didelot Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vayhvx0m.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > Does the bridge code use multicast group when referring to L2? > > The switchdev MDB attribute is very similary to the FDB attribute. It > contains the VLAN ID and the Ethernet MAC address of the group. Hi Vivien I'm just trying to avoid the use of 'multicast group' for a L2 entity, unless it is already widespread used so in the bridge code. If the bridge code does consider L2 a 'multciast group', fine, lets document it so. But if the bridge code only uses 'multciast group' to mean L3, we should not use it here for L2. Andrew