From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] meson: Meson8b and GXBB DWMAC glue driver Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 22:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160901.223731.1152520865580611814.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160830.215732.429612225008644820.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, carlo@caione.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, manabian@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de To: khilman@baylibre.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:44868 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750873AbcIBFhi (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 01:37:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Kevin Hilman Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 21:23:52 -0700 > David Miller writes: > >> From: Martin Blumenstingl >> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:49:28 +0200 >> >>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:40 AM, David Miller wrote: >>>> From: Martin Blumenstingl >>>> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:16:32 +0200 >>>> >>>>> This adds a DWMAC glue driver for the PRG_ETHERNET registers found in >>>>> Meson8b and GXBB SoCs. Based on the "old" meson6b-dwmac glue driver >>>>> the register layout is completely different. >>>>> Thus I introduced a separate driver. >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v2: >>>>> - fixed unloading the glue driver when built as module. This pulls in a >>>>> patch from Joachim Eastwood (thanks) to get our private data structure >>>>> (bsp_priv). >>>> >>>> This doesn't apply cleanly at all to the net-next tree, so I have >>>> no idea where you expect these changes to be applied. >>> OK, maybe Kevin can me help out here as I think the patches should go >>> to various trees. >>> >>> I think patches 1, 3 and 4 should go through the net-next tree (as >>> these touch drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ and the corresponding >>> documentation). >>> Patch 2 should probably go through clk-meson-gxbb / clk-next (just >>> like the other clk changes we had). >>> The last patch (patch 5) should probably go through the ARM SoC tree >>> (just like the other dts changes we had). >>> >>> @David, Kevin: would this be fine for you? >> >> I would prefer if all of the patches went through one tree, that way >> all the dependencies are satisfied in one place. > > David, with your ack on the drivers/net changes, I can take them through > my tree for Amlogic SoCs (which then goes via the arm-soc tree.) Acked-by: David S. Miller