From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND net-next 13/15] smc: receive data from RMBE Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20160902.105933.1696366729773029010.davem@davemloft.net> References: <653f839a-8098-da62-3437-8b002d929a50@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160810.104556.1507709019319192063.davem@davemloft.net> <7121effc-5f89-ac22-bbab-a8aedebae9fd@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, utz.bacher@de.ibm.com To: ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:54678 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751244AbcIBR7e (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:59:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7121effc-5f89-ac22-bbab-a8aedebae9fd@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ursula Braun Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:05:01 +0200 > Understood, I wrongly used xchg() for atomicity. I now realize that I > would need cursor locking for 32-bit architectures - something I would > like to defer. Thus I would like to come up with V2 of SMC-R with > builds restricted to 64-bit architectures only, and thus no usage of > xchg() anymore. Please don't restrict the driver build to 64-bit