* [PATCH v2 1/2 nf] netfilter: seqadj: Fix one possible panic in seqadj when mem is exhausted
@ 2016-09-02 5:08 fgao
2016-09-02 6:59 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: fgao @ 2016-09-02 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo, netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev; +Cc: gfree.wind, Gao Feng
From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
When memory is exhausted, nfct_seqadj_ext_add may fail to add the seqadj
extension. But the function nf_ct_seqadj_init doesn't check if get valid
seqadj pointer by the nfct_seqadj, while other functions perform the
sanity check.
So the system would be panic when nfct_seqadj_ext_add failed.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
---
v2: Remove the unnessary seqadj check in nf_ct_seq_adjust
v1: Inital patch
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
index dff0f0c..2c8e201 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
@@ -16,9 +16,14 @@ int nf_ct_seqadj_init(struct nf_conn *ct, enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
if (off == 0)
return 0;
+ seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
+ if (unlikely(!seqadj)) {
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
set_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status);
- seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
this_way = &seqadj->seq[dir];
this_way->offset_before = off;
this_way->offset_after = off;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 nf] netfilter: seqadj: Fix one possible panic in seqadj when mem is exhausted
2016-09-02 5:08 [PATCH v2 1/2 nf] netfilter: seqadj: Fix one possible panic in seqadj when mem is exhausted fgao
@ 2016-09-02 6:59 ` Florian Westphal
2016-09-02 7:07 ` Gao Feng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2016-09-02 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fgao; +Cc: pablo, netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, gfree.wind
fgao@ikuai8.com <fgao@ikuai8.com> wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
> When memory is exhausted, nfct_seqadj_ext_add may fail to add the seqadj
> extension. But the function nf_ct_seqadj_init doesn't check if get valid
> seqadj pointer by the nfct_seqadj, while other functions perform the
> sanity check.
>
> So the system would be panic when nfct_seqadj_ext_add failed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
> index dff0f0c..2c8e201 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,14 @@ int nf_ct_seqadj_init(struct nf_conn *ct, enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
> if (off == 0)
> return 0;
>
> + seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
> + if (unlikely(!seqadj)) {
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Not sure this WARN() is really needed, I would remove it (since its most
likely only missing due to memory shortage).
Other than that, this looks good.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 nf] netfilter: seqadj: Fix one possible panic in seqadj when mem is exhausted
2016-09-02 6:59 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2016-09-02 7:07 ` Gao Feng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gao Feng @ 2016-09-02 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso, Netfilter Developer Mailing List, coreteam,
Linux Kernel Network Developers
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> fgao@ikuai8.com <fgao@ikuai8.com> wrote:
>> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>>
>> When memory is exhausted, nfct_seqadj_ext_add may fail to add the seqadj
>> extension. But the function nf_ct_seqadj_init doesn't check if get valid
>> seqadj pointer by the nfct_seqadj, while other functions perform the
>> sanity check.
>>
>> So the system would be panic when nfct_seqadj_ext_add failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
>> index dff0f0c..2c8e201 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.c
>> @@ -16,9 +16,14 @@ int nf_ct_seqadj_init(struct nf_conn *ct, enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo,
>> if (off == 0)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + seqadj = nfct_seqadj(ct);
>> + if (unlikely(!seqadj)) {
>> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Missing nfct_seqadj_ext_add() setup call\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Not sure this WARN() is really needed, I would remove it (since its most
> likely only missing due to memory shortage).
>
> Other than that, this looks good.
>
I prefer to keep the warning, although it only happens caused by mem
shortage now.
But it would give the accurate description, if the nfct_seqadj_ext_add
was lost when new features were depending on synadj.
Best Regards
Feng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-02 7:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-02 5:08 [PATCH v2 1/2 nf] netfilter: seqadj: Fix one possible panic in seqadj when mem is exhausted fgao
2016-09-02 6:59 ` Florian Westphal
2016-09-02 7:07 ` Gao Feng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox