From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:44:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160906124413.GC27658@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473129009-20478-1-git-send-email-hejianet@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:30:03AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
...
> v2:
> - 1/6 fix bug in udplite statistics.
> - 1/6 snmp_seq_show is split into 2 parts
>
> Jia He (6):
> proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show
> proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show
> proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show
> proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show
> ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev
> net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warning
Hi Jia,
Did you try to come up with a generic interface for this, like
snmp_fold_fields64() (note the fieldS) or snmp_fold_field64_batch() ?
Sounds like we have the same code in several places and seems they all
operate very similarly. They have a percpu table, an identified max, a
destination buffer..
If this is possible, this would reduce the possibility of hiccups in a
particular code.
Marcelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 2:30 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field Jia He
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in {snmp,netstat}_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-06 22:57 ` David Miller
2016-09-07 2:29 ` hejianet
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in snmp6_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in sctp_snmp_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] proc: Reduce cache miss in xfrm_statistics_seq_show Jia He
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] ipv6: Remove useless parameter in __snmp6_fill_statsdev Jia He
2016-09-06 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] net: Suppress the "Comparison to NULL could be written" warning Jia He
2016-09-06 12:44 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2016-09-07 2:30 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Reduce cache miss for snmp_fold_field hejianet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160906124413.GC27658@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).