From: thomas.zeitlhofer+lkml@ze-it.at
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] vti: use right inner_mode for inbound inter address family policy checks
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:40:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907184038.2neg44xtvlunlrmu@toau> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906111522.GG31137@gauss.secunet.com>
In case of inter address family tunneling (IPv6 over vti4 or IPv4 over
vti6), the inbound policy checks in vti_rcv_cb() and vti6_rcv_cb() are
using the wrong address family. As a result, all inbound inter address
family traffic is dropped.
Use the xfrm_ip2inner_mode() helper, as done in xfrm_input() (i.e., also
increment LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMODEERROR in case of error), to select the
inner_mode that contains the right address family for the inbound policy
checks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zeitlhofer <thomas.zeitlhofer+lkml@ze-it.at>
---
Notes:
v2: implement review comments from Steffen (thanks for the reply):
- return -EINVAL in case of error
- increment LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMODEERROR in case of error
Just to point that out, in case there are arguments against it:
this is done in the namespace of skb->dev and not in the
t(unnel)?->net namespace.
and update the commit message accordingly.
net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
index a917903..c9957ed 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
struct net_device *dev;
struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
struct xfrm_state *x;
+ struct xfrm_mode *inner_mode;
struct ip_tunnel *tunnel = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4;
u32 orig_mark = skb->mark;
int ret;
@@ -105,7 +106,19 @@ static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
}
x = xfrm_input_state(skb);
- family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family;
+
+ inner_mode = x->inner_mode;
+
+ if (x->sel.family == AF_UNSPEC) {
+ inner_mode = xfrm_ip2inner_mode(x, XFRM_MODE_SKB_CB(skb)->protocol);
+ if (inner_mode == NULL) {
+ XFRM_INC_STATS(dev_net(skb->dev),
+ LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMODEERROR);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ family = inner_mode->afinfo->family;
skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(tunnel->parms.i_key);
ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
index d90a11f..52a2f73 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c
@@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
struct net_device *dev;
struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
struct xfrm_state *x;
+ struct xfrm_mode *inner_mode;
struct ip6_tnl *t = XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip6;
u32 orig_mark = skb->mark;
int ret;
@@ -357,7 +358,19 @@ static int vti6_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
}
x = xfrm_input_state(skb);
- family = x->inner_mode->afinfo->family;
+
+ inner_mode = x->inner_mode;
+
+ if (x->sel.family == AF_UNSPEC) {
+ inner_mode = xfrm_ip2inner_mode(x, XFRM_MODE_SKB_CB(skb)->protocol);
+ if (inner_mode == NULL) {
+ XFRM_INC_STATS(dev_net(skb->dev),
+ LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMODEERROR);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ family = inner_mode->afinfo->family;
skb->mark = be32_to_cpu(t->parms.i_key);
ret = xfrm_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb, family);
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-07 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 10:57 [PATCH] vti: use right inner_mode for inbound inter address family policy checks Thomas Zeitlhofer
2016-09-06 11:15 ` Steffen Klassert
2016-09-07 18:40 ` thomas.zeitlhofer+lkml [this message]
2016-09-09 0:17 ` [PATCH v2] " David Miller
2016-09-09 8:36 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160907184038.2neg44xtvlunlrmu@toau \
--to=thomas.zeitlhofer+lkml@ze-it.at \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox