From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [RFC] bridge: MAC learning uevents Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:16:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20160908141626.0ae9025a@xeon-e3> References: <7824e091-6b1a-bf39-0f78-1c9084d59972@herrendoerfer.name> <20160908083920.0d421951@xeon-e3> <9f5db5b9-37dc-91c0-70e2-38644cc5bdb7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "D. Herrendoerfer" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Fainelli Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:35399 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932460AbcIHVQQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:16:16 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w87so21849265pfk.2 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 14:16:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9f5db5b9-37dc-91c0-70e2-38644cc5bdb7@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:30:08 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 09/08/2016 10:19 AM, D. Herrendoerfer wrote: > > > > On 08 Sep 2016, at 17:39, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:06:16 +0200 > >> "D. Herrendoerfer" wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I'd like to start a discussion if it makes sense to add an optional feature > >>> > >>> to the bridge MAC address learning code to generate kernel uevents for > > > > [SNIP] > > > >>> > >>> I'm porting my patch (for 3.10.0) to head, and will make it available, I > >>> just want some > >>> > >>> valuable feedback as early as possible. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, D.Herrendoerfer > >> > >> This should be possible by listening for netlink events. > >> No need for udev interaction. > > > > No, there are none, not for changes to the bridge forwarding table, also this would > > require a tool to continuously listen for changes. > > Wat do you expect uevent to solve here that netlink + a monitoring > program can't? > > There is quite a bit of code in net/bridge/br_fdb.c just to deal with > notifying learned/added MAC addresses, is not that where you should > start adding what you are after (if that is not supported as of latest > mainline)? just like neighbor table modifications, it should be possible to listen for events with netlink. Doing it through uevent is the wrong model.