From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: bblanco@plumgrid.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
brouer@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
u9012063@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] e1000: bundle xdp xmit routines
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:14:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160912221417.5610.37355.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160912220312.5610.77528.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
e1000 supports a single TX queue so it is being shared with the stack
when XDP runs XDP_TX action. This requires taking the xmit lock to
ensure we don't corrupt the tx ring. To avoid taking and dropping the
lock per packet this patch adds a bundling implementation to submit
a bundle of packets to the xmit routine.
I tested this patch running e1000 in a VM using KVM over a tap
device using pktgen to generate traffic along with 'ping -f -l 100'.
Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h | 10 +++
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
index 5cf8a0a..877b377 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ struct e1000_adapter;
#define E1000_TX_QUEUE_WAKE 16
/* How many Rx Buffers do we bundle into one write to the hardware ? */
#define E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE 16 /* Must be power of 2 */
+/* How many XDP XMIT buffers to bundle into one xmit transaction */
+#define E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE
#define AUTO_ALL_MODES 0
#define E1000_EEPROM_82544_APM 0x0004
@@ -168,6 +170,11 @@ struct e1000_rx_buffer {
dma_addr_t dma;
};
+struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle {
+ struct e1000_rx_buffer *buffer;
+ u32 length;
+};
+
struct e1000_tx_ring {
/* pointer to the descriptor ring memory */
void *desc;
@@ -206,6 +213,9 @@ struct e1000_rx_ring {
struct e1000_rx_buffer *buffer_info;
struct sk_buff *rx_skb_top;
+ /* array of XDP buffer information structs */
+ struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *xdp_buffer;
+
/* cpu for rx queue */
int cpu;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 232b927..31489d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -848,6 +848,15 @@ static int e1000_xdp_set(struct net_device *netdev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
+ if (!adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer) {
+ int size = sizeof(struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle) *
+ E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX;
+
+ adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer = vzalloc(size);
+ if (!adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
old_prog = xchg(&adapter->prog, prog);
if (old_prog) {
synchronize_net();
@@ -1319,6 +1328,9 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (adapter->prog)
bpf_prog_put(adapter->prog);
+ if (adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer)
+ vfree(adapter->rx_ring[0].xdp_buffer);
+
unregister_netdev(netdev);
e1000_phy_hw_reset(hw);
@@ -3372,29 +3384,17 @@ static void e1000_tx_map_rxpage(struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring,
static void e1000_xmit_raw_frame(struct e1000_rx_buffer *rx_buffer_info,
u32 len,
+ struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
struct net_device *netdev,
- struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
+ struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring)
{
- struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
- struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring;
+ const struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
if (len > E1000_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
return;
- /* e1000 only support a single txq at the moment so the queue is being
- * shared with stack. To support this requires locking to ensure the
- * stack and XDP are not running at the same time. Devices with
- * multiple queues should allocate a separate queue space.
- */
- HARD_TX_LOCK(netdev, txq, smp_processor_id());
-
- tx_ring = adapter->tx_ring;
-
- if (E1000_DESC_UNUSED(tx_ring) < 2) {
- HARD_TX_UNLOCK(netdev, txq);
+ if (E1000_DESC_UNUSED(tx_ring) < 2)
return;
- }
if (netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq))
return;
@@ -3402,7 +3402,36 @@ static void e1000_xmit_raw_frame(struct e1000_rx_buffer *rx_buffer_info,
e1000_tx_map_rxpage(tx_ring, rx_buffer_info, len);
netdev_sent_queue(netdev, len);
e1000_tx_queue(adapter, tx_ring, 0/*tx_flags*/, 1);
+}
+static void e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *buffer_info,
+ struct net_device *netdev,
+ struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
+{
+ struct netdev_queue *txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
+ struct e1000_tx_ring *tx_ring = adapter->tx_ring;
+ struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ /* e1000 only support a single txq at the moment so the queue is being
+ * shared with stack. To support this requires locking to ensure the
+ * stack and XDP are not running at the same time. Devices with
+ * multiple queues should allocate a separate queue space.
+ *
+ * To amortize the locking cost e1000 bundles the xmits and send up to
+ * E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX.
+ */
+ HARD_TX_LOCK(netdev, txq, smp_processor_id());
+
+ for (; i < E1000_XDP_XMIT_BUNDLE_MAX && buffer_info[i].buffer; i++) {
+ e1000_xmit_raw_frame(buffer_info[i].buffer,
+ buffer_info[i].length,
+ adapter, netdev, tx_ring);
+ buffer_info[i].buffer = NULL;
+ buffer_info[i].length = 0;
+ }
+
+ /* kick hardware to send bundle and return control back to the stack */
writel(tx_ring->next_to_use, hw->hw_addr + tx_ring->tdt);
mmiowb();
@@ -4284,9 +4313,10 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
struct bpf_prog *prog;
u32 length;
unsigned int i;
- int cleaned_count = 0;
+ int cleaned_count = 0, xdp_xmit = 0;
bool cleaned = false;
unsigned int total_rx_bytes = 0, total_rx_packets = 0;
+ struct e1000_rx_buffer_bundle *xdp_bundle = rx_ring->xdp_buffer;
rcu_read_lock(); /* rcu lock needed here to protect xdp programs */
prog = READ_ONCE(adapter->prog);
@@ -4341,12 +4371,13 @@ static bool e1000_clean_jumbo_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter,
case XDP_PASS:
break;
case XDP_TX:
+ xdp_bundle[xdp_xmit].buffer = buffer_info;
+ xdp_bundle[xdp_xmit].length = length;
dma_sync_single_for_device(&pdev->dev,
dma,
length,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- e1000_xmit_raw_frame(buffer_info, length,
- netdev, adapter);
+ xdp_xmit++;
case XDP_DROP:
default:
/* re-use mapped page. keep buffer_info->dma
@@ -4488,8 +4519,14 @@ next_desc:
/* return some buffers to hardware, one at a time is too slow */
if (unlikely(cleaned_count >= E1000_RX_BUFFER_WRITE)) {
+ if (xdp_xmit)
+ e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(xdp_bundle,
+ netdev,
+ adapter);
+
adapter->alloc_rx_buf(adapter, rx_ring, cleaned_count);
cleaned_count = 0;
+ xdp_xmit = 0;
}
/* use prefetched values */
@@ -4500,8 +4537,11 @@ next_desc:
rx_ring->next_to_clean = i;
cleaned_count = E1000_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring);
- if (cleaned_count)
+ if (cleaned_count) {
+ if (xdp_xmit)
+ e1000_xdp_xmit_bundle(xdp_bundle, netdev, adapter);
adapter->alloc_rx_buf(adapter, rx_ring, cleaned_count);
+ }
adapter->total_rx_packets += total_rx_packets;
adapter->total_rx_bytes += total_rx_bytes;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-12 22:13 [net-next PATCH v3 0/3] e1000 XDP implementation John Fastabend
2016-09-12 22:13 ` [net-next PATCH v3 1/3] e1000: track BQL bytes regardless of skb or not John Fastabend
2016-09-13 3:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2016-09-13 4:25 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-13 13:17 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-14 23:57 ` Brown, Aaron F
2016-09-15 0:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-15 4:22 ` John Fastabend
2016-09-15 23:29 ` Brown, Aaron F
2016-09-12 22:13 ` [net-next PATCH v3 2/3] e1000: add initial XDP support John Fastabend
2016-09-12 22:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-12 23:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-12 23:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-13 0:03 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-13 1:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-13 16:21 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-13 17:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-13 17:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-13 17:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-13 18:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rustad, Mark D
2016-09-13 18:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-13 19:14 ` Rustad, Mark D
2016-09-13 21:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-13 22:41 ` Rustad, Mark D
2016-09-13 23:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-14 0:13 ` Rustad, Mark D
2016-09-14 23:42 ` Brown, Aaron F
2016-09-13 23:17 ` Francois Romieu
2016-09-13 17:55 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-13 1:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-18 17:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-13 3:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2016-09-13 16:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-12 22:14 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2016-09-12 23:45 ` [net-next PATCH v3 3/3] e1000: bundle xdp xmit routines Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160912221417.5610.37355.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bblanco@plumgrid.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox