From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Filipe Manco <filipe.manco@neclab.eu>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling on netback_probe()
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:10:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915141004.GM15958@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8e11688-cb11-69f6-2c79-daa0f2b3e8b4@neclab.eu>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:05:17PM +0200, Filipe Manco wrote:
> On 14-09-2016 12:10, Wei Liu wrote:
> >CC xen-devel as well.
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Filipe Manco wrote:
> >>In case of error during netback_probe() (e.g. an entry missing on the
> >>xenstore) netback_remove() is called on the new device, which will set
> >>the device backend state to XenbusStateClosed by calling
> >>set_backend_state(). However, the backend state wasn't initialized by
> >>netback_probe() at this point, which will cause and invalid transaction
> >>and set_backend_state() to BUG().
> >>
> >>Initialize the backend state at the beginning of netback_probe() to
> >>XenbusStateInitialising, and create a new valid state transaction on
> >>set_backend_state(), from XenbusStateInitialising to XenbusStateClosed.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Filipe Manco <filipe.manco@neclab.eu>
> >There is a state machine right before set_backend_state. You would also
> >need to update that.
> Good point I'll update the diagram.
>
> After looking at the diagram and for consistency, shouldn't the transition
> Initialising -> InitWait be handled using set_backend_state()? Currently it
> is done directly in netback_probe() code. If you agree I'll submit a v2 with
> these two changes.
That's fine with me.
Wei.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-13 12:11 [RFC PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling on netback_probe() Filipe Manco
2016-09-14 10:10 ` Wei Liu
2016-09-15 14:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Filipe Manco
2016-09-15 14:10 ` Wei Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915141004.GM15958@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=filipe.manco@neclab.eu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).