netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:15:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919091538.56defd2b@pixies> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_D2ytTK9WjfCPL87E1QomeXg+2GfAvo8N8xCcJULhAC=w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700, pshelar@ovn.org wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Shmulik Ladkani
> <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 1e329d4112..cc2c004838 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >         } else {
> >                 if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> >                               skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
> > -                            skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> > +                            skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> 
> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.

Seems validation in '__skb_vlan_pop' has slightly different semantics:

	unsigned int offset = skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb);

	__skb_push(skb, offset);
	err = skb_ensure_writable(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN);

this pushes 'data' back to mac_header, then makes sure there's sufficient
place in skb to _store_ VLAN_ETH_HLEN bytes (by pulling into linear part
if needed, or erroring if skb is too small).

There's no guarantee the original mac header was sized VLAN_ETH_HLEN.

Interpretation of the following 

		if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
			      skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
			     skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
			return 0;

in 'skb_vlan_pop' might be read as:
"there's no tag, or protocol says its a tag but it's insufficient to pop,
 so lets do nothing".

Is it superflous?

Thanks,
Shmulik

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-19  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-18 10:09 [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop() Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-18 20:26 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-19  6:15   ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-09-19 12:22     ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-19 13:05       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 15:20         ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:04   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:46     ` pravin shelar
2016-09-20  4:36       ` Shmulik Ladkani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160919091538.56defd2b@pixies \
    --to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).