From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:15:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919091538.56defd2b@pixies> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_D2ytTK9WjfCPL87E1QomeXg+2GfAvo8N8xCcJULhAC=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700, pshelar@ovn.org wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Shmulik Ladkani
> <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 1e329d4112..cc2c004838 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > } else {
> > if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> > skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
> > - skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> > + skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
>
> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.
Seems validation in '__skb_vlan_pop' has slightly different semantics:
unsigned int offset = skb->data - skb_mac_header(skb);
__skb_push(skb, offset);
err = skb_ensure_writable(skb, VLAN_ETH_HLEN);
this pushes 'data' back to mac_header, then makes sure there's sufficient
place in skb to _store_ VLAN_ETH_HLEN bytes (by pulling into linear part
if needed, or erroring if skb is too small).
There's no guarantee the original mac header was sized VLAN_ETH_HLEN.
Interpretation of the following
if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
return 0;
in 'skb_vlan_pop' might be read as:
"there's no tag, or protocol says its a tag but it's insufficient to pop,
so lets do nothing".
Is it superflous?
Thanks,
Shmulik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-19 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-18 10:09 [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop() Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-18 20:26 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-19 6:15 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-09-19 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-19 13:05 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 15:20 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:04 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:46 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-20 4:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160919091538.56defd2b@pixies \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).