netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:04:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160919230454.08e58116@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_D2ytTK9WjfCPL87E1QomeXg+2GfAvo8N8xCcJULhAC=w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Pravin,

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700 pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> wrote:
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >         } else {
> >                 if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> >                               skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
> > -                            skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> > +                            skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))  
> 
> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.

Yep, I submitted a v2 with your suggestion, however I withdrew it, as
there is a slight behavior difference noticable by 'skb_vlan_pop' callers.

Suppose the rare case where skb->len is too small.

pre:
  skb_vlan_pop returns 0 (at least for the correct tx path).
  Meaning, callers do not see it as a failure.
post:
  skb_ensure_writable fails (!pskb_may_pull), therefore -ENOMEM returned
  to the callers of 'skb_vlan_pop'.

For ovs, it means do_execute_actions's loop is terminated, no further
actions are executed, and skb gets freed.

For tc act vlan, it means skb gets dropped.

This actually makes sense, but do we want to present this change?

Thanks,
Shmulik

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-19 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-18 10:09 [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop() Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-18 20:26 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-19  6:15   ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 12:22     ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-19 13:05       ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 15:20         ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:04   ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-09-19 20:46     ` pravin shelar
2016-09-20  4:36       ` Shmulik Ladkani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160919230454.08e58116@halley \
    --to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).