From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop()
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:36:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920073602.1d7ec740@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_Dy3osOea19e+iTxHFpCgJOYe1fUJJnaN-PB-hOq0-rmA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:46:10 -0700 pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Shmulik Ladkani
> <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Pravin,
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:26:30 -0700 pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> wrote:
> >> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> >> > @@ -4537,7 +4537,7 @@ int skb_vlan_pop(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> > } else {
> >> > if (unlikely((skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021Q) &&
> >> > skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_8021AD)) ||
> >> > - skb->len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> >> > + skb->mac_len < VLAN_ETH_HLEN))
> >>
> >> There is already check in __skb_vlan_pop() to validate skb for a vlan
> >> header. So it is safe to drop this check entirely.
> >
> > Yep, I submitted a v2 with your suggestion, however I withdrew it, as
> > there is a slight behavior difference noticable by 'skb_vlan_pop' callers.
> >
> > Suppose the rare case where skb->len is too small.
> >
> > pre:
> > skb_vlan_pop returns 0 (at least for the correct tx path).
> > Meaning, callers do not see it as a failure.
> > post:
> > skb_ensure_writable fails (!pskb_may_pull), therefore -ENOMEM returned
> > to the callers of 'skb_vlan_pop'.
> >
> > For ovs, it means do_execute_actions's loop is terminated, no further
> > actions are executed, and skb gets freed.
> >
> > For tc act vlan, it means skb gets dropped.
> >
> > This actually makes sense, but do we want to present this change?
> >
> I think this is correct behavior over existing code.
Ok.
I'll submit a v3 identical to v2 but with proper statement of this
behavior change in the commit log.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-18 10:09 [PATCH] net: skbuff: Fix length validation in skb_vlan_pop() Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-18 20:26 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-19 6:15 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 12:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-19 13:05 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 15:20 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:04 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-19 20:46 ` pravin shelar
2016-09-20 4:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160920073602.1d7ec740@halley \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).