netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	Rana Shahout <ranas@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net/mlx5e: XDP TX xmit more
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:26:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920112649.7054e28b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e732cab-ed54-5e09-569b-f75258e98ad4@gmail.com>

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:19:46 +0300
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jesper,
> 
> On 20/09/2016 10:46 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:58:59 +0300
> > Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
> >>
> >> Previously we rang XDP SQ doorbell on every forwarded XDP packet.
> >>
> >> Here we introduce a xmit more like mechanism that will queue up more
> >> than one packet into SQ (up to RX napi budget) w/o notifying the hardware.
> >>
> >> Once RX napi budget is consumed and we exit napi RX loop, we will
> >> flush (doorbell) all XDP looped packets in case there are such.  
> > I've already raised strong concerns with this approach on the RFC
> > patchset.  Of not really taking advantage of RX bulking.
> > Please do not ignore this!
>
> Sure. Your approach can fit with our plans to split the RX completion 
> poll loop into several stages.
> I will try it when we get there.
> 
> > If you can promise, that we/you will also try to other approach I'm
> > suggesting, then I'm fine with this patch.

I'll take the above as a promise that there are plans to work in the
direction I'm requesting. Thanks!

Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-19 13:58 [PATCH net-next 0/8] mlx5e XDP support Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net/mlx5e: Build RX SKB on demand Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net/mlx5e: Union RQ RX info per RQ type Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] net/mlx5e: Slightly reduce hardware LRO size Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] net/mlx5e: Dynamic RQ type infrastructure Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] net/mlx5e: XDP fast RX drop bpf programs support Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] net/mlx5e: Have a clear separation between different SQ types Tariq Toukan
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] net/mlx5e: XDP TX forwarding support Tariq Toukan
2016-09-20  8:29   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 11:33     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 12:53       ` Tariq Toukan
2016-09-20 15:40         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-20 15:51           ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 15:58             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-20 16:06               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 16:13                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-20 16:27                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 16:45                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-20 16:58                       ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-20 17:39                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-20 18:59                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 19:21                           ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 20:47                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 21:04                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20 16:00             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-20 15:57           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-21  7:57           ` Tariq Toukan
2016-09-21  8:16             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-19 13:58 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] net/mlx5e: XDP TX xmit more Tariq Toukan
2016-09-20  7:46   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-20  8:19     ` Tariq Toukan
2016-09-20  9:26       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920112649.7054e28b@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ranas@mellanox.com \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).