From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Dave Miller <davem@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: DSA: Suspicious RCU usage (via rtnl_bridge_getlink)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:28:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920142858.GP1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160920133833.GD20638@lunn.ch>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Issuing "bridge vlan show" on clearfog provokes a "suspicious RCU usage"
> > warning from the kernel (see below).
> >
> > As it's illegal to schedule while holding the RCU read lock, there's the
> > possibility for this happening much earlier in the call sequence -
> > mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_dump() takes a mutex, and if that mutex were already
> > held, we'd schedule at that point. The RCU read lock was taken by
> > rtnl_bridge_getlink().
> >
> > It looks horrible to fix - mvmdio.c as well as DSA locking are involved.
>
> Hi Russell
>
> I would say this needs fixing higher up, in the bridge code. DSA has
> to be able to sleep, since the switch can be on any arbitrary bus,
> MDIO, SPI, etc. This will affect pure switchdev devices as well, since
> they often need to send a request to the switch and wait for a reply.
Hmm, okay, so looking around, other rtnl operations in there just
use for_each_netdev() or for_each_netdev_safe() without taking
any locks, apart from the rtnl mutex which we can see was already
taken.
Why does rtnl_bridge_getlink use RCU? Can we drop the RCU read lock
and switch to using for_each_netdev() here? Adding Dave and Eric,
as I guess they're more knowledgeable of the core rtnl code.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-20 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 10:26 DSA: Suspicious RCU usage (via rtnl_bridge_getlink) Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-09-20 13:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-09-20 14:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-09-20 14:32 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-09-20 14:46 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160920142858.GP1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).