netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
	Brenden Blanco <bblanco@plumgrid.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] xdp: Infrastructure to generalize XDP
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 01:09:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920230927.GG3291@pox.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36FVU7bNu3JudZuET-VdFND2ZO7n9A7k--qsZVyxTvcpQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/20/16 at 03:49pm, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> wrote:
> > On 09/20/16 at 03:00pm, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> +static inline int __xdp_hook_run(struct list_head *list_head,
> >> +                              struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> >> +{
> >> +     struct xdp_hook_ops *elem;
> >> +     int ret = XDP_PASS;
> >> +
> >> +     list_for_each_entry(elem, list_head, list) {
> >> +             ret = elem->hook(elem->priv, xdp);
> >> +             if (ret != XDP_PASS)
> >> +                     break;
> >> +     }
> >
> > Walking over a linear list? Really? :-) I thought this was supposed
> > to be fast, no compromises made.
> 
> Can you suggest an alternative?

Single BPF program that encodes whatever logic is required. This is
what BPF is for. If it absolutely has to run two programs in sequence
then it can still do that even though I really don't see much of a
point of doing that in a high performance environment.

I'm not even sure yet I understand full purpose of this yet ;-)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-20 22:00 [PATCH RFC 0/3] xdp: Generalize XDP Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 22:00 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] xdp: Infrastructure to generalize XDP Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 22:37   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-20 22:40     ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 22:44   ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-20 22:49     ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 23:09       ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2016-09-20 23:18         ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 23:43           ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-20 23:59             ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-21  0:13               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-21 11:55               ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-21 14:19                 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-21 14:48                   ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-21 15:08                     ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-21 19:56                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-22 13:14                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-22 14:46                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-21 15:39                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-21 17:26                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-09-20 23:22         ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-21  0:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-21  6:39     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-21  8:42       ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-21 15:44       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-21 17:26     ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-09-21 17:39       ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-21 18:45         ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-09-21 18:50           ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-21 18:54             ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-09-21 18:58             ` Thomas Graf
2016-09-23 11:13   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-09-23 13:00     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-09-23 14:26       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-09-25 11:32       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-09-23 14:14     ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-25 12:29       ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-09-20 22:00 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mlx4: Change XDP/BPF to use generic XDP infrastructure Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 22:00 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] netdevice: Remove obsolete xdp_netdev_command Tom Herbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920230927.GG3291@pox.localdomain \
    --to=tgraf@suug.ch \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bblanco@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).