From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shmulik Ladkani Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/sched: act_mirred: Implement ingress actions Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:27:45 +0300 Message-ID: <20160922212745.789734c5@halley> References: <1474550512-7552-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> <1474550512-7552-5-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> <1474556053.23058.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jamal Hadi Salim , WANG Cong , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Shmulik Ladkani To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35775 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965944AbcIVS1v (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:27:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id 133so15467449wmq.2 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:27:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1474556053.23058.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:54:13 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote: > Hmm... we probably need to apply the full rcu protection before this > patch. > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/667680/ Are you referring to order of application into net-next? This patch seems to present no new tcf_mirred_params members nor need-to-be-protected code regions (please, correct me if wrong). So it does not _depend_ on the 'full rcu fixes', does it? Thanks, Shmulik