From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: skbuff: skb_vlan_push: Fix wrong unwinding of skb->data after __vlan_insert_tag call
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:56:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928145644.662ecc04@pixies> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57EB9BE0.4080903@iogearbox.net>
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:30:56 +0200, daniel@iogearbox.net wrote:
> > @@ -4608,6 +4608,8 @@ int skb_vlan_push(struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 vlan_proto, u16 vlan_tci)
> >
> > skb->protocol = skb->vlan_proto;
> > skb->mac_len += VLAN_HLEN;
> > + if (offset)
> > + offset += VLAN_HLEN;
> >
> > skb_postpush_rcsum(skb, skb->data + (2 * ETH_ALEN), VLAN_HLEN);
> > __skb_pull(skb, offset);
>
> This looks much better indeed than your v1 of this patch.
Yep, after some meditation and history digging I happened to notice I
was barking at the wrong tree.
> So the issue might only be visible to act_vlan as the other remaining user of
> skb_vlan_push().
Yes, this is correct. I'll amend the log message to express that.
The bug occurs for callers of skb_vlan_push() whose data is not
pointing at mac_header.
> My only question would be:
> what about __skb_vlan_pop(), wouldn't that then need the same adjustment
> a la offset -= VLAN_HLEN?
Well, theoretically, yes; but caller may expect 2 different things:
(assuming tags are in-payload)
(1) suppose upon entry we have
DA,SA,0x8100,TCI,0x0800,
^ ^
mac_hdr data
initial offset is 18, and after current unwinding code we'll get
DA,SA,0x0800,4_bytes,
^ ^
mac_hdr data
which is probably incorrect, adjustment 'offset -= VLAN_HLEN' is needed.
(2) suppose upon entry we have
DA,SA,0x8100,TCI,0x0800
^ ^
mac_hdr data
initial offset is 14, and after current unwinding code we'll get
DA,SA,0x0800,
^ ^
mac_hdr data
which is probably what user has intended.
(had we adjusted offset to be 10, 'data' would point into SA)
From test I've made using act_vlan upon ingress on QinQ tags, existing call
provides data as in (2).
Thoughts?
Should we adjust "offset" back, only if resulting offset is >=14 ?
Thanks,
Shmulik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-28 9:08 [PATCH v2 net] net: skbuff: skb_vlan_push: Fix wrong unwinding of skb->data after __vlan_insert_tag call Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-28 10:30 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-28 11:56 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-09-28 14:43 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-09-28 17:11 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-09-28 17:42 ` Shmulik Ladkani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928145644.662ecc04@pixies \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).