From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/vxlan: Avoid unaligned access in vxlan_build_skb()
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:56:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928195644.GA10249@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UeEFoA8EQN0Fgn656mFDqC6BdnrUqUfQAJSgEwRBUxBZw@mail.gmail.com>
On (09/28/16 11:08), Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > - then udp_gro_receive -> vxlan_gro_receive pulls up vxlan header
> > into linear part, and then..
>
> This is the point where we need to stop, drop the existing headers,
> call skb_reserve(NET_IP_ALIGN), and then pick back up where we left
> off. We just have to make sure the skbuff isn't shared.
:
> In general the interface behind the tunnel shouldn't need to know
> about any of the data in front of the tunnel, so you should be able to
> drop the original header offsets and reset things if you want so you
> could overwrite the old headers.
Except that some of these encapsulations may be doing things like
[inner-mac, outer-ip] fdb learning, so we may not be able to lose
the outer headers at this early point in all cases.
> If I am not mistaken I think the multi-buffer approach is the approach
> taken by other OSes, although for us it is more difficult since we
yes, I think that's approximately what gets done with mblk/mbufs
(with pullups as needed). But as you point out, this type of
->frag_list chaining is a non-trivial change.
> I'm sure we are all going to be talking about this in great detail
> next week at netdev/netconf.. :-)
Agree.
--Sowmini
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 14:27 [PATCH net-next] net/vxlan: Avoid unaligned access in vxlan_build_skb() Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 15:31 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 15:49 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 16:11 ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 16:31 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 16:43 ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:07 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-20 17:15 ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:09 ` Jiri Benc
2016-09-20 17:19 ` Tom Herbert
2016-09-20 17:24 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-22 5:52 ` David Miller
2016-09-22 21:30 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-23 12:06 ` David Miller
2016-09-23 14:17 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-23 17:20 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-23 17:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-23 23:41 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-24 0:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-28 17:03 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-09-28 18:08 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-09-28 19:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2016-09-20 16:45 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928195644.GA10249@oracle.com \
--to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).