From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] rxrpc: More fixes and adjustments
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:10:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <20161004.201051.821616397135404483.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20161003.020236.1905952240188445872.davem@davemloft.net>
        <147527161156.28826.2148784664652062075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
        <10083.1475596890@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <10083.1475596890@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:01:30 +0100

> What's the procedure for sending more fixes at this point?  Do I send them
> against net-next, since net doesn't contain the things to be fixed yet, or do
> I wait for net to catch up?

I'm sending Linus a pull request later today for the stuff in net-next,
and once he takes that all the trees will be synced up and you can start
sending fixes.

Thanks.