From: Eric Garver <e@erig.me>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
pravin shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] openvswitch: normalize vlan rx path
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:21:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161005192132.GR25403@egarver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161005210709.79732b27@griffin>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:07:09PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:44:26 -0400, Eric Garver wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:31:52PM +0300, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > > Just seemed less future safe to keep a pointer to an old packet lying around.
> >
> > I agree. Alternatively refresh the eth pointer.
>
> Sorry guys, that just doesn't make sense. Everyone should know that
> reloading of skb pointer means the former pointers to its data may
> become invalid. Please point me to any place in the kernel where we
> reload the data pointer "just because" even when not used.
>
How about this incremental change?
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
index 7ef02752d4ba..0dd36f353c53 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -562,7 +562,6 @@ static int ovs_packet_cmd_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct sw_flow *flow;
struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts;
struct datapath *dp;
- struct ethhdr *eth;
struct vport *input_vport;
u16 mru = 0;
int len;
@@ -584,14 +583,12 @@ static int ovs_packet_cmd_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
nla_memcpy(__skb_put(packet, len), a[OVS_PACKET_ATTR_PACKET], len);
skb_reset_mac_header(packet);
- eth = eth_hdr(packet);
/* Normally, setting the skb 'protocol' field would be handled by a
* call to eth_type_trans(), but it assumes there's a sending
* device, which we may not have. */
- if (eth_proto_is_802_3(eth->h_proto))
- packet->protocol = eth->h_proto;
- else
+ packet->protocol = eth_hdr(packet)->h_proto;
+ if (!eth_proto_is_802_3(packet->protocol))
packet->protocol = htons(ETH_P_802_2);
if (eth_type_vlan(packet->protocol)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-05 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-05 13:07 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] openvswitch: make vlan handling consistent Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] openvswitch: normalize vlan rx path Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 14:18 ` Eyal Birger
2016-10-05 17:23 ` Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 17:31 ` Eyal Birger
2016-10-05 18:44 ` Eric Garver
2016-10-05 19:07 ` Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 19:21 ` Eric Garver [this message]
2016-10-05 21:07 ` Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] openvswitch: remove unreachable code in vlan parsing Jiri Benc
2016-10-06 5:22 ` Pravin Shelar
2016-10-06 9:08 ` Jiri Benc
2016-10-05 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] openvswitch: fix vlan subtraction from packet length Jiri Benc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161005192132.GR25403@egarver \
--to=e@erig.me \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).