From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] conntrack: enable to tune gc parameters
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:04:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161010140424.GB21057@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476094704-17452-3-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> wrote:
> After commit b87a2f9199ea ("netfilter: conntrack: add gc worker to remove
> timed-out entries"), netlink conntrack deletion events may be sent with a
> huge delay. It could be interesting to let the user tweak gc parameters
> depending on its use case.
Hmm, care to elaborate?
I am not against doing this but I'd like to hear/read your use case.
The expectation is that in almot all cases eviction will happen from
packet path. The gc worker is jusdt there for case where a busy system
goes idle.
> +nf_conntrack_gc_max_evicts - INTEGER
> + The maximum number of entries to be evicted during a run of gc.
> + This sysctl is only writeable in the initial net namespace.
Hmmm, do you have any advice on sizing this one?
I think a better change might be (instead of adding htis knob) to
resched the gc worker for immediate re-executaion in case the entire
"budget" was used. What do you think?
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ static void gc_worker(struct work_struct *work)
return;
ratio = scanned ? expired_count * 100 / scanned : 0;
- if (ratio >= 90)
+ if (ratio >= 90 || expired_count == GC_MAX_EVICTS)
next_run = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-10 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 10:18 [PATCH net 0/2] conntrack update Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-10 10:18 ` [PATCH net 1/2] conntrack: remove obsolete sysctl (nf_conntrack_events_retry_timeout) Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-10 13:57 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-17 15:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-10 10:18 ` [PATCH net 2/2] conntrack: enable to tune gc parameters Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-10 14:04 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-10-10 15:24 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-13 20:43 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-14 10:12 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-14 10:37 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-14 10:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 11:16 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-18 8:30 ` [PATCH net] conntrack: perform a full scan in gc Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-18 8:47 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-18 10:06 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-18 12:37 ` [PATCH net] conntrack: restart gc immediately if GC_MAX_EVICTS is reached Nicolas Dichtel
2016-10-19 16:02 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-19 16:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-20 8:50 ` [PATCH net] conntrack: perform a full scan in gc Nicolas Dichtel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161010140424.GB21057@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).