From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@nicira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: use core MTU range checking in core net infra
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:40:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019144006.GF18569@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161019135529.GA11224@bistromath.localdomain>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:55:29PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2016-10-18, 22:33:31 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > geneve:
> > - Merge __geneve_change_mtu back into geneve_change_mtu, set max_mtu
> > - This one isn't quite as straight-forward as others, could use some
> > closer inspection and testing
> >
> > macvlan:
> > - set min/max_mtu
> >
> > tun:
> > - set min/max_mtu, remove tun_net_change_mtu
> >
> > vxlan:
> > - Merge __vxlan_change_mtu back into vxlan_change_mtu, set min/max_mtu
> > - This one is also not as straight-forward and could use closer inspection
> > and testing from vxlan folks
> >
> > bridge:
> > - set max_mtu via br_min_mtu()
> >
> > openvswitch:
> > - set min/max_mtu, remove internal_dev_change_mtu
> > - note: max_mtu wasn't checked previously, it's been set to 65535, which
> > is the largest possible size supported
> >
> > sch_teql:
> > - set min/max_mtu (note: max_mtu previously unchecked, used max of 65535)
>
> Nothing for other virtual netdevices? (dummy, veth, bond, etc) Their
> MTU is limited to 1500 now. Also missing macsec and ip_gre, probably
> others that are using ether_setup.
Yeah, I've clearly missed more than I thought. Doing another sweep now.
I'm thinking more and more that we ought to back out the patch that sets
min/max in ether_setup, save it for last, after we're sure everyone that
calls it has been prepared.
> [...]
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> > index 89a687f..81fc79a 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> > @@ -184,17 +184,15 @@ static struct rtnl_link_stats64 *br_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev,
> >
> > static int br_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> > {
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
> > struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
> > - if (new_mtu < 68 || new_mtu > br_min_mtu(br))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> >
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER)
> > /* remember the MTU in the rtable for PMTU */
> > dst_metric_set(&br->fake_rtable.dst, RTAX_MTU, new_mtu);
> > #endif
> >
> > + dev->mtu = new_mtu;
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -390,6 +388,7 @@ void br_dev_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> > dev->hw_features = COMMON_FEATURES | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> > NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX;
> > dev->vlan_features = COMMON_FEATURES;
> > + dev->max_mtu = br_min_mtu(br);
>
> br_min_mtu uses br->port_list, which is only initialized a few lines
> later (right after the spin_lock_init() at the end of the context of
> this diff).
Ah, okay, I'd just grouped it with the other dev->foo settings.
> Besides, I don't think this works: br_min_mtu(br) changes when you add
> and remove ports, or when you change the MTU of an enslaved
> device. But this makes the max MTU for the bridge fixed (to 1500).
Okay, how about this: set no max_mtu (or set it to IP_MAX_MTU/65535), and
then retain a check against the possibly ever-changing br_min_mtu(br) in
br_change_mtu()?
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c
> > index e7da290..d5d6cae 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-internal_dev.c
> > @@ -89,15 +89,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops internal_dev_ethtool_ops = {
> > .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> > };
> >
> > -static int internal_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
> > -{
> > - if (new_mtu < 68)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > - netdev->mtu = new_mtu;
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void internal_dev_destructor(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct vport *vport = ovs_internal_dev_get_vport(dev);
> > @@ -148,7 +139,6 @@ static const struct net_device_ops internal_dev_netdev_ops = {
> > .ndo_stop = internal_dev_stop,
> > .ndo_start_xmit = internal_dev_xmit,
> > .ndo_set_mac_address = eth_mac_addr,
> > - .ndo_change_mtu = internal_dev_change_mtu,
> > .ndo_get_stats64 = internal_get_stats,
> > .ndo_set_rx_headroom = internal_set_rx_headroom,
> > };
>
> vport-internal uses ether_setup, so the MTU is currently limited to
> 1500, no?
Yeah. Sweep ongoing...
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 2:33 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: use core MTU range checking everywhere Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: use core MTU range checking in USB NIC drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: use core MTU range checking in wireless drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 7:38 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-19 14:27 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 14:28 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: use core MTU range checking in WAN drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-21 12:04 ` Krzysztof Hałasa
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: use core MTU range checking in core net infra Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 12:17 ` Jiri Benc
2016-10-19 14:51 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 13:55 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-10-19 14:40 ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2016-10-19 15:28 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-10-19 15:46 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 13:06 ` Aaron Conole
2016-10-19 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-19 14:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-19 14:17 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 14:15 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 14:07 ` Haiyang Zhang via Virtualization
2016-10-19 14:23 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 22:21 ` Shrikrishna Khare
2016-10-19 2:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: use core MTU range checking in misc drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-19 14:37 ` Robin Holt
2016-10-19 16:05 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2016-10-19 22:38 ` Stefan Richter
2016-10-20 3:16 ` Jarod Wilson
[not found] ` <20161020031641.GJ18569-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-22 9:36 ` Stefan Richter
2016-10-22 18:51 ` Stefan Richter
2016-10-19 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: use core MTU range checking everywhere David Miller
2016-10-19 19:29 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] ethernet: use net core MTU range checking in more drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] net: use core MTU range checking in USB NIC drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] net: use core MTU range checking in wireless drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 18:22 ` Johannes Berg
2016-10-20 18:38 ` David Miller
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] net: use core MTU range checking in WAN drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] net: use core MTU range checking in core net infra Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 18:05 ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-10-20 20:12 ` Kershner, David A
2016-10-20 20:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-21 2:37 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-21 3:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-10-21 13:24 ` Aaron Conole
2016-10-21 10:09 ` Wei Liu
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] net: use core MTU range checking in misc drivers Jarod Wilson
2016-10-21 6:52 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
2016-10-21 16:22 ` Sebastian Reichel
[not found] ` <20161020175524.6184-8-jarod-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-22 7:17 ` [net-next,v2,7/9] " Sven Eckelmann
2016-10-22 19:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] " Stefan Richter
2016-10-22 19:27 ` Stefan Richter
2016-10-23 1:18 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-23 14:29 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] firewire: net: fix maximum possible MTU Stefan Richter
2016-10-23 14:30 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] firewire: net: set initial MTU = 1500 unconditionally, fix IPv6 on some CardBus cards Stefan Richter
2016-10-24 1:50 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-24 12:26 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2 v2] " Stefan Richter
2016-10-25 3:05 ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-26 21:29 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] " David Miller
2016-10-29 20:16 ` [PATCH net-next] firewire: net: really fix maximum possible MTU Stefan Richter
2016-10-30 3:01 ` David Miller
2016-10-24 1:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] firewire: net: " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-26 21:29 ` David Miller
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] s390/net: use net core MTU range checking Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 17:55 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] ipv4/6: use core net " Jarod Wilson
2016-10-20 18:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] net: use core MTU range checking everywhere David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161019144006.GF18569@redhat.com \
--to=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pshelar@nicira.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).