From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Solomon Peachy <pizza-pCgMCH4qpMRg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Berg
<johannes.berg-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024154215.2863586-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the
possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization
presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition
of WARN_ON:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c:1457:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
As the driver just checks the same variable twice here, we can simplify
it by removing the second condition, which makes it more readable and
avoids the warning.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c | 15 +++++++--------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
index 680d60eabc75..094e6637ade2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
@@ -385,14 +385,13 @@ static int wsm_multi_tx_confirm(struct cw1200_common *priv,
if (WARN_ON(count <= 0))
return -EINVAL;
- if (count > 1) {
- /* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
- ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- else if (ret > 0)
- cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
- }
+ /* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
+ ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (ret > 0)
+ cw1200_bh_wakeup(priv);
cw1200_debug_txed_multi(priv, count);
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
--
2.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 15:41 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
[not found] ` <20161024154215.2863586-1-arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 13:24 ` [PATCH] cw1200: fix bogus maybe-uninitialized warning David Laight
2016-10-25 18:13 ` Solomon Peachy
2016-10-25 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161024154215.2863586-1-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johannes.berg-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pizza-pCgMCH4qpMRg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox