From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix-timers: make it configurable Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:51:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20161026085102.GC11974@localhost.localdomain> References: <1477448931-29051-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1477448931-29051-6-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: John Stultz , "Yann E. MORIN" , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Josh Triplett , Edward Cree , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1477448931-29051-6-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:28:51PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > +config POSIX_TIMERS > + bool "Posix Clocks & timers" if EXPERT > + default y > + help > + This includes native support for POSIX timers to the kernel. > + Most embedded systems may have no use for them and therefore they > + can be configured out to reduce the size of the kernel image. Can you please fix this sentence? It doesn't make any sense. "Most" is making a definite statement of fact, while "may have no use" is not. Either you mean: 1. Most embedded systems have no use for them. 2. Embedded systems may have no use for them. or expressing #2 in other words: 3. Many embedded systems have no use for them. 4. Some embedded systems have no use for them. Take your pick. (But I doubt #1 is really true, and so I would like to see some numbers to back up that claim.) Thanks, Richard