public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <stephen.suryaputra.lin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ICMP redirects behavior
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:01:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027150121.GB30102@ssuryaputra-desktop> (raw)

Hi, All,

I noticed through code inspection that ICMP redirects behavior is
different after commit 5943634fc5592037db0693b261f7f4bea6bb9457.

In v2.6 kernel, it used to be that ip_rt_redirect() calls
arp_bind_neighbour() which returns 0 and then the state of the neigh for
the new_gw is checked. If the state isn't valid then the redirected
route is deleted. From what I can tell, this behavior is maintained up
to v3.5.7 by check_peer_redirect() because rt->rt_gateway is assigned to
peer->redirect_learned.a4 before calling ipv4_neigh_lookup().

After the commit, ipv4_neigh_lookup() is performed without the
rt_gateway assigned to the new_gw. In my case since rt_gateway (old_gw)
isn't zero, the function uses it as the key. The neigh is valid since
that gateway is the one that sends the ICMP redirect message. Then the
new_gw is assigned. The problem is: the new_gw ARP never gets resolved 
and the traffic is blackholed. My version is v3.18.24.

Is there a justification for this behavioral change? I traced the origin
of the code to v2.1.15 where the check is performed when
rfc1620_redirects is set. I propose the following patch to restore the
previous behavior.

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 62d4d90..510045c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -753,7 +753,9 @@ static void __ip_do_redirect(struct rtable *rt,
struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow
                        goto reject_redirect;
        }

+       rt->rt_gateway = 0;
        n = ipv4_neigh_lookup(&rt->dst, NULL, &new_gw);
+       rt->rt_gateway = old_gw;
        if (!IS_ERR(n)) {
                if (!(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
                        neigh_event_send(n, NULL);

Regards,

Stephen.

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161027150121.GB30102@ssuryaputra-desktop \
    --to=stephen.suryaputra.lin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox